Jump to content
icon Ag awards
icon
SIGN UP FOR +350 NO DEPOSIT SPINS!

Sign up to get the industry's best deals.

By subscribing you are certifying that you are over the age of 18.

This offer is not applicable to residents of Great Britain.

By subscribing you are certifying that you have reviewed and accepted our updated Privacy and Cookie policy.

Connect with us

Notifications

What's new

    Notifications
    failed to load.

    You don't
    have any
    notifications.

    View all
    Login

    Connect with us

    pinnit2015

    Members
     View Profile  See their activity

    • Posts

      4806

    • Joined

    • Last visited

    • Days Won

      284

     Content Type 

    Everything posted by pinnit2015

    1. pinnit2015
      Same as Coco - even if i meet wagering with only 20 left, I take it out and put the 20 in another casino - not because i think they flick they rigged switch, but to not take anything out after all that wagering is bad for the soul. I remember years ago having 2k after wagering and thinking I'll play 100. That 100 turned into 1.5k back to them and the sick feeling stuck with me since. I also think a spot of Gamblers Fallacy kicks in as well for me.
    2. pinnit2015
      Bump - did they pay you yet?
    3. pinnit2015
      Haha, just seen... No Fiekie, no job at the UKGC - apparently I was deemed to be too competent or something. Wheest. So instead I’m taking up my role at the head of bet365 for a cool 240 million. No bonus offers, 7 day pending periods and we don’t deal with ADRs - poacher to gamekeeper will be complete :-p Not played JJ for nearly a month though - I’m fact, the only ones iv seen are the half empty ones in the cupboard :-p.
    4. pinnit2015
      Sorry, but those two games are pretty high variance. Iv been butchered on both, with no bonus, on regular occasions with balances bigger than yours ;-) If there was anything strange going on, it would have happened during wagering, like say you complete wagering with 1 quid in your balance :-)
    5. pinnit2015
      I do genuinely hope they survive the current casino culling that seems to be going around but I have genuine concerns over their long term future given their insistence on being a single platform casino. There'd certainly be no justice in the world if they ceased to exist whilst other, tin pot licensed casinos who rip players off, continue.
    6. pinnit2015
      I can't hit 50 on Bonanza at the mo Smoke and Mirrors
    7. pinnit2015
      AFAIK this games had the biggest BTG x win? Someone hit a 20000 from one pound. Agree with Fiekie - the base game is brutal and a bit too HV for me. Good hit though
    8. pinnit2015
      Speaking of these - that Fruit Shop is Casumo’s one yesterday was playing great. Only placed 16th or something so reward wasn’t great - I though I was on for a top 3 but it died. The game gave 400x wins so I was up about 200. Casumo have increased their stakes for theirs which is rubbish. Playing 60p on Netents is a slow death usually. As for VS Clash of the Spins - waste of time. Bug bearer for me is tournaments that has wagering attached to the win - hello LV Bet. You wager x amount at relatively big stakes and they slap in a 35x wagering. No thanks.
    9. pinnit2015
      Both - a truely lethal combination :-p
    10. pinnit2015
      Last session I had on it was: 20p:160 or whatever win. Upped to a quid and then....’out of money’ The last few quid bonus rounds have been really poor. Like JJ it seems to prefer 40p bonus rounds. Defo one for 50 20p spins and move on. If you get it up then raise stake but don’t hope for much. I still like it though. Unlike Bonanza, you do get the feel it could throw out a whopper in the 7 spins.
    11. pinnit2015
      What I don’t get... people, in their normal lives, will take meticulous care of their money. The look at reviews of the lastest Vacuum Cleaner or Car, they check and compare prices, they decide not to purchase certain models of items due to their poor reviews. Etc etc. Then they decide to gamble. Major difference is now we’re dealing with serious money - both deposit wise and potential win wise. Most don’t read reviews, don’t check the casinos reputation, don’t select the ‘best product’, despite the fact that in many cases the stakes are, literally, higher. Honestly don’t get it. Gamblers are either dumb or greedy - or both, cos that makes no sense to me.
    12. pinnit2015
      And....if it is a rogue casino you'll be told that your withdrawals limits are 5k a month or they'll offer you 1% of the Jackpot win to settle it there and then. Auch, don't be silly, surely MG would step in and do something about that....*cough Playtech*
    13. pinnit2015
      I'd 5 free spins from VS battle that gave 160 10k spins without free spins is brutal.
    14. pinnit2015
      Been on a bit of a break - got the tent loaded, my new telescope and took myself up North Scotland to do some fishing and star gazing. Magic
    15. pinnit2015
      Agree with V - years ago 32 Red's reliability/trustworthyness, and the fact they had/have Viper, was a major selling point. In todays climate they remind me of Nokia - once market leaders who have stagnated whilst others have improved. Recipe for disaster. Even if you look at their offers, they've gone from 100% depo offers to as low as 10%. Whether that's due to the Kindred takeover, I dunno.... Now? Other casinos are faster, equally as reliable, have better loyalty schemes and more choice of providers. With the c@@p that MG throw out I can't imagine depositing there to just play Immortal Romance. Agree with the must have winnings in an hour - always find that weird; sometimes i wonder if Player X has used those winnings in another casino, without receiving the money and then the delay throws everything off. Only thing that annoys be is where they don't adhere to their own timescales.
    16. pinnit2015
      Casino's never see my bank statement...when asked, i refuse. Sorry, I was referring to the banking institution who may look at my incoming and outgoing monies....I know that Barclays will likely close the account at some point as i think there's been a cull by some banks on people who use accounts for such. Totally agree with Skrill etc - they've had it too easy for too long. Now with the new Money Laundering Reg's targeting them as being soft touches (which they are as they don't care), casinos are restricting their use. Their fees are disgusting tbh and with the advent of Trustly, which is free and faster, i won't miss them one iota. Oh, and their customer service is amongst the worst I've ever seen.
    17. pinnit2015
      They may ask, depending on the financial institution, what the transfers to Skrill are for. You document you outgoings, they see payment to British Gas etc so if the amounts to Skrill are considerable, it's only natural they may ask what these are for. Banks aren't stupid as well - they know e wallets are used heavily in gambling. Each lender has their own criteria - some are more flexible and less intrusive depending on their attitude to risk etc so it will depend on them. Personally i use a bank account that only has gambling transactions - i've been surprised it's not been closed tbh. Means that when i show them my salary etc they see nothing as it's with a different bank. In terms of credit scores -you don't have one
    18. pinnit2015
      To be fair to the OP....i think people, incorrectly, used SE to simply close accounts in the past. Now the consequences are coming back as it's been highlighted more that SE is a RG tool, not a 'i don't like the company' tool. Answer to your question - you're just going to need to play at those that you aren't SE. I can't imagine MG saying no to your win at a non SE casino. Otherwise they'd need to check every MG casino. In fact, i don't even think legally they'd be allowed to do that. Beware though - more and more casinos are merging and any SE will be carried over - even if they're not on the same licence. Presumably you're not on Gamstop because then that becomes a different conversation.
    19. pinnit2015
      i think the casinos, upon a successful complaint for the player, should state some sort of action point to show how they aim to reduce the number of similar complaints in the future Something like this: Complaint - player denied winnings due to casino invoking some vague, anti consumer, term in their t's and c's Upheld for player Casino Action - A management decision has been taken to stop the informal/unseen policy of trying to shaft players.
    20. pinnit2015
      Hardly been playing recently, had a 10 quid cash bonus from Casumo so thought i'd just 9p DOA. Only the 1 WL
    21. pinnit2015
      A broker? As it you pay someone else to play for you? Now that doesn't sound remotely ropey
    22. pinnit2015
      For info and thanks - funds rec'd.
    23. pinnit2015
      I'd hazard a guess that i only make on average x10 the wagering amount. The days of low wagering bonus offers are long gone - you still get a few decent ones, like Sky Vegas's X5, but they're pretty rare. x35 is a push nowadays. I play HV games, well medium to high. I have neither the patience or the desire to grind out wagering so it's bonus or nothing in the 50 2 quid spins i may do. x40's on the average side for most places. Just don't play at a place that will cap a deposit bonus because that's morally reprehensible
    24. pinnit2015
      Agreed. That will have been over a week before in my bank. What's more annoying with them is that they are a good joint in most other respects. To be fair, i expected more of them when they came to the UK but they still haven't got a loyalty scheme, which is becoming the distinguishing feature in people deciding to deposit where, and now their withdrawals are all over the place. Shame - they had the means of being a decent joint. And their offers just disappeared.
    25. pinnit2015
      Dunder started off well and then just tailed off - seemingly having caught the MT grinch bug You'll be paid as long as in order so I wouldn't worry.
    ×
    • Create New...