pinnit2015

Depends what your deposits are - even if you showed 8k in the bank untouched but proceeded to lump 50k in, the one off payment isn't going to matter much to them, they'll want to know how your're funding the rest. But if you show modest deposits they'll probably think that's fine, up to a certain value of deposits. What was it asked for under Resp Gambling or AML? Rightly or wrongly, they're fully within their rights to pick and choose who they do business with and part of their policy may be only to accept customers who can show a steady stream of income. But, like i said, it depends on what grounds it was asked for - if you deposit 100k and can show a house sale of 750k and other cash then job should be done on their end. So, they may allow you to deposit up to a certain amount and then ask you again for your income details etc Everywhere is different and it can be hard to tell what their policies are and how risk averse they are atm (which, is very, in a lot of cases)

Anyone played this by PNG? If not, I'll save you the bother - it's a hot, steaming, *****. Probably know, I'm not PNG's biggest fan - LV games that play as HV etc (and Thunderkick have edged in front of them recently) but boy, this game sucks. Obviously not a big sample size but i loaded 200 quid to play it on 20ps and it was one of the most unenjoyable experiences I've had in the last year. It's fine that slots are scripted in some way but this one looks like it is and doesn't even try and hide it. Managed to get to the 80 collection bit and it gave a shite 100x. Apart from that it's just a series of microwins and very little potential (even if it claims 7500x) - like how? Plus point is that it's a good advert for Responsible Gambling - playing this for an hour or two will put you off slotting for a good month.

Only taking free spins, playing with a blindfold, noiseless headphones or even getting a monkey to click start is just putting tapering over the cracks dude. You might do it for a while and then the whole ‘oh I felt it playing well in those 25 FS’ will lead to deposit, which will lead to chase. Sounds ok in theory but it would require the mental strength of Alan Turing to maintain it. Plus, it’s still keeping slots in your head; freebies or otherwise.

Going to shill LandL casinos but they give back 10 percent on each deposit as Cashback. No wagering, no limits. But you lose it if withdraw so remember to take it out before you do: casino casino and fun casino I think.

Whilst I like TP for certain things, casino related products are so patchy for reviews. I buy Bose headphones, if they’re good I’ll say so, if they aren’t I say so. But with gambling, even the casino sites, you hear faff like ‘one star, cos I bet over the max’ etc. Hard to sort the wheat from the chaff these days.

Without getting drawn into whether it’s right or wrong, what will probably happen is that they ‘cut off’ the account. Primarily because you can see the headline now ‘Evil casinos allow folk on state benefits to play starburst’ Some folk will say benefits are no different to employment income; if fact, could argue they’re more ‘reliable’ End of day; it’s a source of income but one in which casinos will likely get nervous about if it’s the sole source.

Was it from another 10 CAD deposit?

Out of curiosity, how did you find it? Im from U.K. and never even came across it. Nor any spam etc from dodgy affiliates.

Tombola have slots that have 98.5 RTP so it’s not out with the realms of possibility but given they’ve a U.K. licence and the one you’re talking about, toilet paper, I know which one id trust

Curacao so, as long as you pay the 'business' fee, you can state the earth is flat and it's held to be a valid proof.

It looks like something from Windows 1965 as well. I can almost see the pixels.

Pump and dump Last time I heard that it was used rather accusatory towards me

Again, no offence, but i don't know why anyone would want to play at these places - even google struggles to put them on page 1.

if it's in the LV Group then they will be

To be honest mate i think the whole 'I'll only play with bonus spins etc' is a bit of a false economy - bit like someone saying they'll only play the videoslots free rolls, not cash - works for a while, from knowing some folk, but then the cash deposits come back. Know there's been people who claim/have re-trained their brain re gambling and some sections of folk are successful in re-introducing 'self control' (even i have had to do so) but my broad brush thought would be that if you (not you, general you)struggle to control yourself re gambling and frequently tilt every time you play then it's cold turkey or nothing - every person i have known that has had an issue has had to go down this route and for those that tried the old 'just 2 cigs a day' approach, frequently found themselves back in tilt/cash deposit mode. But everyones different, so what ever works.

Not a fan of Playtake in the slightest - had a few decent wins in my days playing there but equally seen beasts like Epic Ape run through 100 quid in nanoseconds on minimum bets.

Also add Volt Casino and Kaboo to mix FYI - it's not an agreement between the casinos and the processors, per se, it's just these casino have signed up to 'Visa Direct' Don't know why they aren't making folk more aware of it - it's a massive selling point (and for UK anyhow, hopefully will see an end to people like Skrill charging nearly a fiver for withdrawals)

There’s the disparity; online casinos are bending over backwards trying not to get hammered over AML issues yet it’s far easier, and simpler, to launder in land based.

The only God i pray to is the Bonanza plus 5 one. He too is a bit of an absentee landlord.

I'd like to know how people find these sites? They must be so far down on the google search engine they're verging on the dark web.

Yes, this is from the paper who once claimed that the following were contributory factors to cancer. The Medical Council were, naturally, a tad miffed: - pringles - facebook - oral ***** (though unconfirmed - more research needed) If you wrapped the worst traits of people into one, poorly written rag, it's what you'd end up with.

The OP has yet to master the difficult art of reading terms and conditions as well as they clear state what's requested and when. They must have been playing at clip joints who, whilst they may not ask for docs, it's cos they don't pay you.

Be it an agenda laden left wing media, espousing the evils of gambling and how the UK's children are going to grow up to be a bunch of degenerate Starburst playing moron's, there is certainly a looking down the noses if you mention you gamble. Hey, off out on the lash to get pissed and eat a kebab - that's fine. Hey, i like to roll 9ps on DOA - oh, you should see someone about that.

Sorry, couldn't resist Sky Vegas, Willy Hill.... To be fair i've not put 10000's in there but certainly above 2k.

Gamstop isn't, YET, fit for purpose (probably why the GC isn't making it mandatory) Can't speak for the CRA's but they maybe use a 'best match' - I do know that i have 'failed' a credit check when applying for a credit card in the past as i put an E at the end of my surname (and had to get it re-run) so be surprised if 'close' matching would allow you to verify.... Pass.