pinnit2015

Wild Frames made a late run to be worst release as well.

Whilst not having massive luck on them yet 1. Tombstone 2. Money Train 3. Temple Tumble MW's Worse - near enough every other MW's but mention to Legacy of Ra, Holy Diver

Relax Gaming - Temple Tumble is by far the best Megaways incarnation (damnation) and Money Train's an excellent slot Push Gaming to continue making VERY HV games BTG - well, the shines coming off them; some awful releases this year in Monopoly and Holy Diver 4thePlayer have shown some decent potential with 9K Yeti, so will see if they push on Nolimit City - jury's still out. Tombstones an excellent HV game, others not so much WMS - hope they make a come back, but doubt it Worst providers are between Netent/PNG/MG Edit - WORST - Yggdrasil

Now capped at x2 the original amount borrowed so usually in and around the 1000% mark Speaking of which, they've all gone to the wall as well; 3 more into administration this week Moral of story: Casino's are evil, offering vice like hobbies to the degenerates and must be curbed Payday lenders target vulnerable groups of folk but can still operate at a mere 1000% interest rate Ironically, the 2 go hand in hand

Jesus man you need to start to find the withdrawal button.... They’re all different; if you make 50k of deposits in a day you might get hit with one, you make 50k over two years, possibly not. What’s your gambling budget? SOW isn’t just based on deposits but how long they know you, your type of play and several other factors that may or may not push you into the high risk category

Poor withdrawal times and low limits re withdrawals; wouldn’t touch 10bet; far better out there Casumo are good but are behaving a bit dodgy with their SOW requests themselves. Personally iv had no problems with Casumo, Redbet, Videoslots. Depends what you’re looking for; offers, withdrawal speed, slot selection; each casino has their own perks for each of these for example

Eh?

As far as I remember Betsson aren’t that receptive when you ask for them. Not many casinos are these days. I probably get one offer every two weeks on some of my regular joints and even then you’re talking 50%. In a few years or sooner I envisage them disappearing completely like Sweden. Youre better off at somewhere like Casinocasino where you get Cashback etc that has no wagering or max cash outs IMO

Keep in mind that whilst winning at a casino shouldn't affect your benefits, should it flag up to the DWP then they may start to scrutinise it as 'regular income' - there was a court case years again about whether it constituted capital, income or earnings but i can't remember the details. Whilst playing slots may not impact this much given their nature, if you engage in matched betting (using exchanges) I imagine there would be a bigger risk.

Same indicator as if they notice a pattern of reversing and losing withdrawals (though that's somewhat of a cheek given that casino's allow you to), or failed deposits etc: they've been told to use all that info to make an assessment if there is a risk of a gambling issue.

Only going by what the UKGC has put in their guidance to casinos as part of the ability to spot the signs of possible issues; believe they've used it as a POSSIBLE risk indicator. That's not to say if you ask 'hey, had a bad run, any chance of a 200% offer' you'll get tagged with this but i think the general thoughts would be if folk are consistently on at casinos to give them a bonus, that would be somewhat of a red flag.

Agree,we have a culture now of no responsibility amongst players but sitting side by side that is casinos previously willing to take money off SE players though knowing they could trot that out if they won. What’s important is sorting it out and, though I don’t have any stats easy to hand, I don’t know if there’s much of a solution at present. Now seen the move of GS players playing in non UKGC jurisdictions and claiming ‘they shouldn’t have let me, money back please’; another symptom of the same mentality I guess. Google payday loans UK irresponsible lending and you’ll see some common threads (though different, some similar commentary)

As for GS; yeah, not including a space in certain fields seems to circumvent it etc. You’d have thought someone would have thought of that. We can be quite creative in the U.K.

Agree but surely part of the issue is that, under MGA for example, the SE only applies to the actual brand, not across all sister sites/white labels etc like in the UK so it's natural that most SE issues would flow from the UK given this? Also, casino's don't exactly help themselves here when they actively allow players to register exactly the same details on other sites and don't prohibit at the point of a/c creation (L&L stop you as soon as you enter the details for example the others not all the time..)

That's the thing, there's no need for it. You: - Pay people what they've won, don't ***** them around trying to invoke convoluted terms breaches, pay them quickly, have a quick site with selection and have half decent CS and word gets around. Pretty insulting to think we're all that thick to believe it. Ends up harming IMO because now i think their management are dodgy (and if they approved it, then there's probably some truth in that)

On it The guy i was speaking to sounded so thick he would probably believe i'm Scrooge McDuck

No comment Maybe the rep can add what was the outcome of their appeal to the UKGC over licence revocation cos i'm sure that had the potential to play a bigger part in the decision than something that's not even happened yet. I think A. Taxes and B. RG compliance/possible fines are a bigger deterrent to UK facing casinos.

Knowing how they work man, that'll send their Responsible Gambling Team into a cold sweat - asking for one is deemed to be an indicator of gambling issues (and i kinda agree to an extent as a broad brush view) but if you used the words 'until i improve etc' they'll be having mild convulsions.

Speaking of which, Slotmillion have not closed my a/c but still asking for: Nahhhhh I sent them an upload of Spongebob Squarepants instead and it was rejected.

Probably...Nat said above there was an issue and maybe they've fixed it? But back to playing here - unless ur Gamstopped, why even put a quid near here?

But it's hard to hit a 'bonus round' in them

It's beyond tacky. Marlena is, well, i don't know - fictional? And as for their 'proof of existence' - don't know what exactly it proves but ho hum Given their shilling I'd take anything with a pinch of salt Oh and check out THE LOWEST RTP settings I've seen Hopefully this balances some of their shilling

Mind it's capped at 75 quid or something and be way of how their wagering works -it goes up and down like a weather balloon.

Dwane, or the Stakers CEO as he’s most commonly known as, is at least a bit more savvy by including some moderately negative points.

Possibly, Quickiespin?