Jump to content
icon Ag awards
icon
Notifications
Login
EN

Afi4wins

Members
  • Posts

    18303
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    729

Posts posted by Afi4wins

  1. Damn! Got excited at first upon reading the title, but at the end of the read, naaaah, the excitement dissipated into smoke! 😜

    Top 3 prizes are not cash, 4th -  250th placing cash prize (700$/EUR - 20$/EUR), up to 500th placing gets 30FS, min bet is 0.50 cents, so need a BIG starting balance...and there are already over 200 names on the leaderboard by today!

    Hmmm, that's the 2nd contest this month I simply cannot partake. 😒

  2. @cocopop3011 Casino Estrella is RESTRICTED for my country, so you need to get your team to update and amend the info in the review section please.

    Also, both Lucky 31 and Casino Extra's links don't work, so I guess both casinos must be restricted for me as well. Kindly look into this please.

    Additional:  Spinz Casino, Wildz Casino, Hyperwin Casino, Dublinbet Casino,  are also restricted for my country as well. 😒

  3. @loceff13@Potatohead, @kavaman, @ales200, @blondie

    Can you guys give some kind of response to this contest please? The more participants the better, and perhaps @cocopop3011 can then change the prize structure. A simple "I may participate" or "I may not" will suffice.

    The usual rule in contests in AG is always to allow more members (both new/old) to participate.

    Pragmatic's 2000 EUR contest has 10 winners, AG's own contest has 7 winners, so it's only reasonable that a 1000 EUR contest should have half of Pragmatic's number of winners, ie, 5 winners.

    Just my honest opinion there. 😉

  4. @cocopop3011  Honestly speaking, I'm not much in favour of the contest!

    Why? Most of the games play with 0.20 or 0.25 cents min bet, and only a very few games can play with 0.10 cents bets. Meaning, a slightly bigger starting bankroll would be needed (especially in my case), so I would definitely need to have a good chance of getting onto the leaderboard to take part - 3 prizes would be insufficient, 5 prizes would be best!

  5. 7 hours ago, Flatzem said:

    I was wondering if AG forum could make it where it would indicate if a members account is banned...

    it would show for example in red... (the account name would be in red colour) or the words Banned in red, so many options..

    so if you read a post by a banned member you would see that they are banned and well you can't replay to them in the thread for example..

    so basically somewhere underneath the account name: it would have for example.... the words BANNED account (and you could include the reason... so it would be for example: Banned for disrespecting admin,,,,, or Banned for cheating in a contest, or Banned for trolling, or Banned for spamming) or in other cases where an account hasn't been logged into for a long time it would have Dormant account or Closed Account

     I see this done on other forums.

    Not a bad idea bro, but honestly speaking, I don't see the benefits for us members by showing the banned members.

    I'd prefer to just let the sleeping dog lie - peacefully.😜

  6. 5 hours ago, Fiekie247 said:

    I would have honestly just admitted , apologized , excused myself from this contest and hope to be able to partake in the next one.

    Especially after he is the one accusing most of us about our screenshots like with Afi's, suggesting additional proof should come with screenshots etc

    But he could not been uphold this simple standard.

    Yes, exactly, and from that day onwards, I have not trusted him anymore.

  7. Jan is saying that AG's contests are illegal and do not abide to regulations?! AG is operating under an umbrella of deceipt???!!!

    What? He's a lawyer-wannabe now?...or faking to be one!? He's talking BS! There's nothing wrong with the legality of 'members-only' contests - it is not open to non-members, nor to the general public!

    I'm still ranting cos Jan is now accusing AG with such rubbish! 🤬

  8. 26 minutes ago, cocopop3011 said:

    No proof provided yet. I do find it odd that he would submit a screenshot but not he willing to provide me a Player ID but still claim innocence and try and turn it around on me 🤣 I find it bizarre that someone would waste such an opportunity when he already had a qualifying screenshot anyway.

    Jan is claiming that someone or something (maybe a poltergeist?) screewed up his screenshot, yet when he knew before taking that screenshot that it wasn't the winning amount or screenshot that he had just won, but he took it anyway. So, who or what screewed what up now?!

  9. 38 minutes ago, cocopop3011 said:

    Oh he would have been kicked a long time ago if it were Valdes. I was always the ‘softer’ one as he used to say 🤣

    @cocopop3011 I ABSOLUTELY AGREE!!! Valdes would not have tolerated such behaviour and posts from any member and would have banned that person a long time ago. Just look at the previous years when Valdes was in charge...a few members got banned and kicked out for much lesser serious mistakes done by them!

    You asked Jan for his ID and he replied with threats and rude comments instead...yet absolutely nothing of his required ID! I'm 99.9% sure that this Jan is dishonest, a sore loser, and 'I'm always right and you are wrong' kind of person! Sheeeesh!

  10. @cocopop3011 I do believe that everyone deserves the benefit of the doubt...but everyone else is working too, although not on 12-hours shift as Jan does, but that shouldn't give him unnecessary many extra days just to get his ID info from a 24hrs/365days online casino does it???

    A 48 hour timeframe was initially given to Jan, a check/search with the casino/provider was unsuccessful, and all the existing evidences are against him.

    I can produce/create a falsified screenshot on one of my own screenshot just to prove that faking one's own screenshot is not that hard to do!

    I just want to say my piece of mind on this matter but it's your final decision in the end.

×
  • Create New...