loceff13

Nothing is guaranteed but it would be better odds of qualifying.

Is the feature available in ONE Blackjack or just the live tables where you sit in 6 handed etc. The other live tables are $10 NZD table min, One are $2 but also really slow because you are waiting for 150+ people to pick options. I may request the option to play in another currency if others can play substantially cheaper.

I just don't want to be tagged in the accumulator thread because the rules of that comp mean I would be an 'entrant' until the end of the year(or go without posting for 30 days) despite me not wishing to compete it in any longer when the next competitior is 10000x ahead of me.

I'm out of this one, can you stop tagging me in the leaderboard Icy

I think this makes alot of sense, ie have a look at Icy's first screenshot of the 2500x+ win. The falling coins animation happens to cover all the jackpot values when the image was taken, theres no way to prove it's a $1 spin based on that first image as far as I can tell. The fish in the screenshot looks to be a $4 one which iirc can appear in $1-$8 betsizes etc. Theres really nothing to stop people screenrecording a higher bet feature and then picking a still frame where the falling coins cover the jackpot values and misrepresenting it as larger xwin. The coin fall is a standard animation and theres always frames where they cover all the jackpots. The only thing to give it away is the fish value in the image(if any are displayed) if it does not match the fish values from the claimed bet size. It's a pretty huge flaw you can only get around by having the person take a screenshot during the last spin of the feature in that title(3x Catch). Not pointing the finger at you for cheating Icy but I think future entries need to show the features last spin with the betsize on screen.

@marius1978 once you guys are about 10000x ahead of me I might have to concede this comp lol, at this rate might be this month

A bit of a wall of text but my feelings on it and why I'm not entering. Missed the mentions of me in this thread when forum notifications was broken, the minbet rule is fine with me(I do think USD minbet is wrong and should be .10 but no one here plays in it so its not a huge issue). It's more the level of competition here today, it means you need ~200x for 10th place and it got very expensive if you don't manage to place. With the high volatiltiy slot picks it's actually easy to lose 1000x($200) without qualifying a 200x+ win and losing more than 10th place money($188NZD). I know I'm not alone in this happening often to players here. AG has also not got as many 200%+ deposit bonuses listed onsite these days, not sure who works on that side of the platform to get new offers and casinos but theres less appealing offers available than there were in the past to take advantage of bonus funds when competing against high rollers to have a chance of the big wins. AG also had several casinos listed wrong like 250% but it's actually a 100% initial deposit, 75% second, 75% third etc when it really should just be listed as 100% imo, annoying signing up to said casinos and wasting time finding that out. Then you have the issues of certain casinos having gamelog issues(ie they only display the first 1000 spins and sort from beginning etc) and you don't know that until you have already deposited your $$ and thats a pain the butt as a player when they are required for a valid entry. I've always said the competitions here are generous but for me they are on the expensive side now and beyond my comfort level to compete. Losing 2 or 3 in a row is a mortgage payment I could make sooner, my priorities lie elsewhere. I've listed what other sites have done in the past to make things more fair as their platforms/competitions grew, thats not where AG is going and thats a-ok to stick to big win style comps. The fact is on other platforms you can qualify for 50-250eur prizes in random draws(and bin win ones too) and it only costs you tens of dollars at most to qualify for random draws which is more appealing even if the odds are not great. I don't lose as much and generally get to play slots I prefer rather than forced titles every comp.

Didn't think it would be honest to rank the stuff, I've not played at any of the casinos listed iirc, only aware of 6/10 providers and played 4/10 of the slots but required to rank them all as I understood things.

Better update this before the time limit runs out, not posted elsewhere 1552x

This leaderboard is insane lol good job guys

April #4(and 3) not posted elsewhere 664x

1271.7x

I don't know the answer but with the level of competition here now(300-400x required for last place in comps, even for 10eur) it got expensive this year to compete week to week. It's really easy to lose 1000x(200NZD) and not hit a 400x to get a prize of similar value. It isn't really worth the risk when losing 3 comps in a row is a mortgage payment down the drain. As Marius says if it's not financially viable then one shouldn't compete. Other sites have suffered the same issue as they grew larger. The bulk of them got rid of the big win side entirely and went to 30/50/100x win to qualify and pick 10/15 random winners etc to share the prizepool. That way people are not spending too much week to week. Something like premium/accumulator could remain the same. Another way is to split the prizepool, ie 2k pragmatic might be structured: bigwin 1st: 500 2nd: 300 3rd: 200 random prizes 30x or higher to enter 10x100eur

Not entering so dont worry lol.

Ok so the gamble bit wont be an issue, tried to gamble a $2 win on 20c bet, gamelog shows it as $2 spin that won $8.