Which one is responsible for gambling addiction: Livestreamers or Youtubers?

[Player101]

If YouTube influencers can fake their videos and edit them just to show how lucky they are, livestreamers can also use sponsored accounts or virtual balances. Still, I think that whether they use real money or not, they share everything in real time, and they show that gambling is not easy and is actually risky. this presents a more realistic perspective of the industry compared to edited YouTube videos that discuss only positive experiences and big fortunes made. What do you think?

[cocopop3011]

12 hours ago, Player101 said:

If YouTube influencers can fake their videos and edit them just to show how lucky they are, livestreamers can also use sponsored accounts or virtual balances. Still, I think that whether they use real money or not, they share everything in real time, and they show that gambling is not easy and is actually risky. this presents a more realistic perspective of the industry compared to edited YouTube videos that discuss only positive experiences and big fortunes made. What do you think?

Yeah I think you have a really valid point! How are these streamers getting the balance - are they fund it themselves or sponsored most of the time? 

[Player101]

21 hours ago, cocopop3011 said:

Yeah I think you have a really valid point! How are these streamers getting the balance - are they fund it themselves or sponsored most of the time? 

Sometimes they use their own money, and sometimes they don’t... it depends on the casino they represent itself. For example, a streamer can earn thousands of dollars in an hour and show no REAL excitement at all. He looks completely indifferent. Does that mean he’s rich enough not to care? I don’t think so 

[keisha96]

If we have only these two options, of course they both are responsible. But I think youtubers bring more harm as most people watch YouTube more often than streamers.