Afi4wins

Aaah...thanks for clearing that up mate. ? Well then, those NetEnt guys should have said that "yes, both the Demo and the Real Money mode uses the same game platform"...and NOT "both modes play the same"...which can be scientifically or mathematically proven wrong! Hehehe. For further clarifications, some software providers do mention that the special features in their games would use 'special reels' or 'separate reels' when the features are in play, and would resort back to the base game reels after that. In other games, when no such statement have been made, then you can be sure that the feature games either do not use the same base game reels, or that a special additional sub-program (to regulate that base game reels) would come into play. Ah well...I know some readers would still not believe all this...but never mind. ?

Hahaha...sorry Santoro mate...but Lady Luck...just like time...waits for nobody! It comes and goes beyond anyone's control...or expectations! How many times have you been ready...with enough cash in your wallet...to play to win...but didn't...and how many times have you had way too little money left, then suddenly got a nice winning surprise? What I mean is...nope...Lady Luck is NEVER waiting for you when you're ready...it's always been...READY OR NOT, HERE I COME...but of course...she doesn't come always!!! ?

Really??? Oh geeees! ?

I played at Jetspin...and at one more casino too...and the fact is, the game cannot be stopped (quickspinned) as in DOA 1! It's not just at Trada but everywhere! ?

Okaaaay...I'm PUSHING it aside... ?

And I was never in nor out...purely an observer!

Well, I'm really glad that some regulars here do share my opinion! ? Casinos should clearly state that both Demo and Real Money play uses the same game program...then it wouldn't be so misleading, but knowledgeable punters would know better that the payouts would be continents apart! ?

You mean to say, Trada Casino confirmed that the Demo and Real Play both play the same? ? What they should have said instead is that both the Demo and Real Play versions play using the one and same game program...but both operating under separate 'working/operating environments'...which DOES NOT produce same results!!! This can be proven by scientific equations, even by the the simplest Newton Law's equation of F = G*m1*m2/r2, whereby we change F=Result, G=Operating Environment (variable, not constant), and the rest being the actual game program (constant). Because G is not constant, the result of each spin is not constant (not the same either)! I don't want to go into great details about this, but I simply hate when casinos state that both Demo and Real Play are the same!!! ?

Well, I've always said that someone would win an incredibly huge win in the early stages of any newly released game...and there it goes yet again! A 30,000x win...a huge eye-opener for punters...a wallet-opening adrenaline push to almost everyone reading it...hahahaha.

Enough of bull droppings from this game...better improvements my foot indeed...hehehe. Now going back to my Quantum Electro Dynamics...at least I can learn something new...and something more interesting too...

And this is what I got by choosing the High Noon Saloon feature...12 free spins...only 1 Wild symbol came...so where the f**k are the stacked Wilds for the 2x or 3x multipliers??? Simply more bull dropping than the non-sticky Wild feature...

I presume then that your 300 quid run went dead, Mr P? I wouldn't be surprised though... ?

I tried the game out in fun mode, just to check out how the Train Heist feature would play and pay... the 1st Free Spins game came on the 637th spin...paid a lousy 11x win, even though reaching the 15x multiplier!!! ... the later ones came faster and paid better too...the best was 166x win, also reaching the 15x multiplier!!! ... but I really won't trust these payouts until I actually can get them in the real mode!

Okay, I'm back from a quick and short bounty hunt...with nothing to bring back, of course...but with plenty to say! Hahaha. Firstly, I must admit, NetEnt did a very nice upgrade on the game's presentation - the Wild symbols are nice and I simply love the vibrant colours for the medium symbols. However, the low symbols seem to be drowning since the background is now transparent, unlike the old version, making them much less distinct. Secondly, the paytable is still the same...but I really hope the algorithms remain the same too! Thirdly, the 2 extra Free Spins features are really not productive, unless in very rare occasions, so the Old Saloon choice would still be the best, as far as I can see. The Stacked 2x and 3x Wild multipliers would not produce big wins, going by the old version of the free spins, simply because they tend to stack up on the last 2 reels mostly, but when stacked on reels 2 and 3, they hardly created big wins either, so if this algorithm is still the same, the new feature won't make much difference to the payouts! Fourthly, the Train Heist is a bit of a bull! You need to get 16 Wild symbols to get that extra 5 free spins, which is simply ridiculous! Most probably, the Wild symbols do not stick as in the other 2 features, so it may be possible to reach that 16x multiplier level eventually...but trying to get 8 Wilds was already damn tough enough before, and I have never seen 12 Wilds ever before...so the algorithms for this feature must definitely be different...for better or for worse! I'd bet it'll be for the worse! Well, we'll see how the game would play and pay soon enough...and I would also love to see how much of my 'presumptions' would actually be accurate! Hehehe.

Yeah...right...and I was about to take out my elephant gun to aim at you... ?

I hope it'll be a contest that I and many others can enter...or else...we'll all might just jump into the sea...errr...for a swim of course! ?

'Proper' for the developers...'suffer' for the punters!!! ?

NetEnt's 'Temple Of Nudges' put them at rock bottom - if you like this game, you've been suckered by them. DOA 1 still couldn't give me much of the 'old enjoyment' - what can DOA 2 do in these days to prevent more disappointments???

You have not even made your first deposit at Sevenbet...haven't played at the casino...and you're already praising it like its an Hollywood celebrity??? ? Oh come on...even sisters can be miles apart...what more casinos!!! Earlier on, I had an intention of signing up at Svenbet, but after visiting their website, I simply WALKED AWAY!!!

Yes, I listened to it...but...I don't think everyone should listen to it! Hehehe. It is purely for gamblers who can say...as the lady said..."I have enough money that won't kill me to lose them"...oh geees! How many gamblers you know are like that?...and how many gamblers you know are actually on the opposite? And all for the sake of 'alignment'...of aligning oneself to happiness? Oh geees... We all love gambling because of the thrill of winning...no doubt about that...but to carry on gambling just to stay 'aligned'? Oh come on... ?

Aaaah...but Napoleon isn't the only rascal doing that sort of 'teasers'...I have played some other games that would land 1 and 2 reels full of Wild symbols, on reels 4 and 5...but creates no wins at all! Are all that by coincidence? Nope...I would most probably say 'by design'! ?

Can you imagine the nightmare casinos and software providers would face if winning spins can go continuously for even several spins in a row? Some punters like to double up their bets with every win, so winning 5 spins in a row, for example, would give that punter a final win of 16x the initial bet size...with a final total win of 31x...that's like winning on $1 bet in the 1st spin, then on $2 bet on the 2nd spin, and on $16 bet on the 5th spin...and that's just for 5 straight wins in a row! The total win from those 5 spins alone could be huge! Why not win 30 times in a row? Oh come on...those developers aren't stupid...somewhere in those programming lines, there must be a command line that prevents the RNG from dishing out a certain specific number of straight winning spins! How many straight winning spins have you ever encountered so far? As far as I can remember, it could be about 3, or 4 at most...but never big wins...then it would run dry again in recovery! Don't even have to think why you can't get many winning spins in a row!

Must be the same for our Katemak too...all quiet on her battlefront! ?

It all boils back to one same statement...stick to the casino/s that you tend to win more times than at other casinos! ? Taking into consideration of all the possibilities, probabilities and of the myriad of variances along the way, from the software's server, into the casino's managing system, then into the player's machinery (smart phone, laptop, desktop, etc), the outcome of any game can never be constant! Even the very small variances in the electricity's amperage can cause slightly varying results, like missing out a few incoming data for a split second, causing a very small fluctuation in the algorithms of the game, and even causing a total malfunction if the electricity surge is above the accepted limits. Heeey, nobody said that any simple thing, like playing a casino game for example, is actually simple and straightforward! The workings of even a very basic and simple thing can be so damn blardy complicated and sophisticated, and that is the real truth of everything in life! ?

That's the thing with all these incredible claims - they always claim, or say, and always believe, that this one miraculous win 'could come at any time, at any day, and without expectation'. Yes, theoretically, it is indeed a possibility, but not a probability (hope readers can differentiate the difference between 'possibility' and 'probability' - in scientific language, one means 'yes, there is a very remote chance that it may happen', whilst the other means 'no, it probably will not happen within a lifetime'). Coming back to my topic - that is exactly the point that I have been trying to make here...anything can be possible, but if it is something 'not probable' within anyone's span of lifetime, then that statement should state its 'actual probability period' of possibly several life spans...or not be published at all...or simply be banned from being stated...because such statement can be very deceitful!