August Screenshot Contest - Win a Share of 750 EUR - PREMIUM MEMBERS

[Afi4wins]

Sooner or later someone will definitely hit a 3000x multiplier on Zeus game!

[Afi4wins]

Unofficial Leaderboard

1st @loceff13 3060x 

2nd @formerPokerpro 1382x 

3rd @marius1978 1265x 

4th @Blackjax 1188x 

5th @Icy 326x 

6th @Flatzem888 253x 

7th @Afi4wins 137x 

All winning positions have now been taken up!

Note: It is every participant's responsibility to read and to comply to the contest rules - no reminders will be given!

[marius1978]

Fighting till the last here... 

[marius1978]

Just hit a 1,400x on Stormborn... Still time 

[formerPokerpro]

and how much have u lost chasing it? 

[marius1978]

Started on 2,500 - at 3,500 now. Didn't you know, I don't lose on slots 

[marius1978]

Can't sit up for the last hour and a half sadly, need my sleep before work tomorrow! This was the closest I got:

Stormborn,

1,407x

[Maiwen]

Zeus vs hades 1325x

 

[Maiwen]

Zeus vs Hades- 3714x

 

[Afi4wins]

@Maiwen After checking your forum activity over the last several days, you were active only on one day to make 5 posts, and then you disappeared! Then on the last day of the contest, you submitted your entry.

From what I understand, the new rule require your posts to be spread out over several days, not all in one single day as you have done, which would not qualify you to enter the contest!

@cocopop3011 Personally, as I understand the new engagement ruling, Maiwen does not meet the engagement rule, so his last day entry shouldn't be valid. Anyhow, I'll leave this for you to decide.

[Maiwen]

35 minutes ago, Afi4wins said:

@Maiwen After checking your forum activity over the last several days, you were active only on one day to make 5 posts, and then you disappeared! Then on the last day of the contest, you submitted your entry.

From what I understand, the new rule require your posts to be spread out over several days, not all in one single day as you have done, which would not qualify you to enter the contest!

@cocopop3011 Personally, as I understand the new engagement ruling, Maiwen does not meet the engagement rule, so his last day entry shouldn't be valid. Anyhow, I'll leave this for you to decide.

The rules state: "ALL contests require every member to engage in the forum with AT LEAST 5 posts elsewhere in the forum. Posts within the contests section do not count. These MUST be posted within the contest dates. You must complete this requirement at least 96 hours before the contest closes; this means anyone waiting until the last day to complete engagement and enter a screenshot will not qualify for entry. If you have submitted an entry, you must remain active in the forum throughout the contest. These contests are for active members; you cannot turn up and enter with no engagement UNLESS you are a brand new player."

 

I posted my messages 96 hours before the contest closed. Staying active on the forum for the entire duration of the contest is sometimes impossible, especially since it's the middle of summer, the holiday season, and there are sometimes unforeseen circumstances that force us to be absent for a few days.

 

The new rule does not require that the posts be spread out over several days. You must read the rule carefully.

[Blackjax]

@Afi4wins looks like you thought about the rule of comments being spread across days but did not write it. 

You have mentioned that after making a screenshot you need to be active in the forum. @Maiwen completed his post requirement but never posted a screenshot. He did that on last day. So I believe he has followed the rule. 

But I like this rule of spreading posts across few days and I also suggested this in the past. Hopefully we adopt it in future contests. 

[Afi4wins]

@Maiwen I know and understand what you are saying and arguing about, but my understanding of the contest rules seem not to be mutually agreeable by most members. I don't make the rules - I simply copied and posted them as requested by @cocopop3011.

The final decision lies in her hands, but I will post 2 unofficial leaderboard results for her to use in the end.

[Afi4wins]

3 hours ago, Blackjax said:

@Afi4wins looks like you thought about the rule of comments being spread across days but did not write it. 

You have mentioned that after making a screenshot you need to be active in the forum. @Maiwen completed his post requirement but never posted a screenshot. He did that on last day. So I believe he has followed the rule. 

But I like this rule of spreading posts across few days and I also suggested this in the past. Hopefully we adopt it in future contests. 

@Blackjax The purpose of making that new engagement rule is to AVOID members from coming into the contest on the VERY LAST DAY to post their winning screenshot and to make 5 posts!

If @Maiwen had submitted ONE contest entry on the 1st or 2nd day of the contest, then submits his 5 posts later on before the 96 hours timeframe is up, then he is within the new rules requirement.

What @Maiwen did is more of what an OPPORTUNIST usually do in the previous contests, and that is what the new rules intend to discourage!

[Afi4wins]

Unofficial Final Leaderboard

1st @loceff13 3060x (250 EUR) 

2nd @marius1978 1407x (200 EUR) 

3rd @formerPokerpro 1382x (100 EUR) 

4th @Blackjax 1188x (75 EUR) 

5th @Icy 326x (50 EUR) 

6th @Flatzem888 253x (40 EUR) 

7th @Afi4wins 137x (35 EUR)

 

Note: @Maiwen Your 3714x entry is not acceptable

because it doesn't meet the new engagement ruling. 

Congratulations to all the winners!

 

ALTERNATIVELY:

 

Unofficial Final Leaderboard

1st @Maiwen 3714x (250 EUR) 

2nd @loceff13 3060x (200 EUR) 

3rd @marius1978 1407x (100 EUR) 

4th @formerPokerpro 1382x (75 EUR) 

5th @Blackjax 1188x (50 EUR) 

6th @Icy 326x (40 EUR) 

7th @Flatzem888 253x (35 EUR) 

-------------------------------------------

8th @Afi4wins 137x 

Congratulations to all the winners!

 

[Afi4wins]

*** CONTEST IS NOW CLOSED ***

[marius1978]

3 out of the top 4 is Zeus vs Hades. Sounds familiar? Yes it does sound familiar, because it happens EVERY GOD DAMN TIME.

TWICE a month! 

Nevermind calling these contests AG this and AG that. They have one name, and one name alone:

The Monthly Zeus vs Hades Chore

[lucks_maximus]

11 hours ago, marius1978 said:

3 out of the top 4 is Zeus vs Hades. Sounds familiar? Yes it does sound familiar, because it happens EVERY GOD DAMN TIME.

TWICE a month! 

Nevermind calling these contests AG this and AG that. They have one name, and one name alone:

The Monthly Zeus vs Hades Chore

This contest should add some rule like the previous month's winning slot(s) should be excluded. Or a rule where the first place winning slot  is excluded for the rest of the year.  Easy enough to add, follow, and enforce.

[Flatzem888]

26 minutes ago, lucks_maximus said:

This contest should add some rule like the previous month's winning slot(s) should be excluded. Or a rule where the first place winning slot  is excluded for the rest of the year.  Easy enough to add, follow, and enforce.

slots that were 1st in premium contests this year,

ZvH:GoW, (3 times)

ZvH:GoW 250, (2 times)

Angel vs Sinner (2 times)

Xmas Drop (1 time)

    

other AG contests;

the count (1 time), zvh:gow (2 times), zvh:gow 250 (1 time), angel vs sinner (1 time), tombstone slaughter (1 time), reactoonz (1 time), power pops (1 time), Train Heist Johnny Cash (1 time)

funfact: loceff used ZvH:GoW (8 times this year)(and placed 1st with it 5 times and 2nd 3 times) golly

 

[marius1978]

Its dominance would show even more if you included all the times it's taken up the top-3 or top-4. It just shows that the best option by far if you want to place high in these contests is to play ZvH, anything else and you're at a great disadvantage. And even though it really is an awesome slot - something especially Loceff can agree to, with his 3 fabulous max wins and all -   it just feels against the whole concept of a "general" contest that you're pretty much forced to play one slot alone (and its clones obviously).  We've seen in the provider contests that they are becoming more and more a one slot alone type of thing, so at least the AG ones should offer some incentive for variation and exploration.  Remember:  "All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy"  

[loceff13]

I've advocated for changes last month but would prefer a every 2nd month type special theme or something or allow every player to nominate 2 slots to block for everyone ahead of the contest starting.

 

@marius1978 Would you be open to a restriction on active slots at a casino(ie only 1 active slot at kingbilly/casinos that allow multiple slot sessions, not 2-4 at a time), it's a huge advantage to play more volume that way and one of the reasons I pick the titles I do to compete here. 

 

Obviously if you have multiple casinos you are wagering on you can play 1 slot at each with AG in mind etc but your casino gamelog for an entry would have to show only 1 active slot being spun or be DQ'd etc.

[loceff13]

On 8/27/2026 at 4:39 AM, marius1978 said:

Fighting till the last here... 

What I mean is this kind of thing, it's a huge edge to play this way if you have a high balance and you would be playing 4x as many spins an hour than others on a casino that does not allow it.

[Blackjax]

Why are we advocating to ban stuff? 

If anyone thinks zeus vs hades is an advantage then you guys should play it too. If one person has the patience to sit through 4-5 or more hours on one slot and get those hits then you guys should try it too. All of us have some advantages. Few people have a huge bankroll, some have low betsize in their favor and some get extended bonuses. 

The only way to make this fair is everyone makes a deposit of €50 with 100% bonus, plays the same slot on the same bet size and at the same casino or same rtp version. Apart from this no way to make this fair. 

[marius1978]

1 hour ago, loceff13 said:

@marius1978 Would you be open to a restriction on active slots at a casino(ie only 1 active slot at kingbilly/casinos that allow multiple slot sessions, not 2-4 at a time), it's a huge advantage to play more volume that way and one of the reasons I pick the titles I do to compete here. 

Limiting the number of active slots would be impossible to enforce. How would we know? It's not a special feature in select casinos - it's only that some have it readily buildt in. You can open multiple windows and play as many simultaneously in the same casino as your pc can handle. Not every provider though, like Push for example.

I agree multitabling is a huge edge for getting the spins in, like it should be in what is pretty much a wagering contest.

I don't mind ZvH, I like to play it too. But I like variation also