pinnit2015

'Her great, great granddaughter?' - what age are you saying she is Sharon looks great for 95 to be fair. Be going from Cocopop to Coconuts in 0-60

Never mind verifying the screenshots, after Kayenne29 in the last one, you're gonna need to do full KYC on the members to make sure it's really them - have them stand still with a selfie, with next weeks paper being held aloft.

Yeah, and quite rightly, they don't accept UK Where you have 2 of the more respected licensing regimes, one undermining the other by tacitly allowing casino's to take UK players, wouldn't go down well.

Underrated British boy Band

MGA casino's wouldn't do this I'd imagine - sure they're be a punch up in the car park. True that Videoslots for example allowed folk to play in places like Aussie Land for a while but that was different - they didn't, and don't, have a licensing regime. Dodgy casino's (Gale Martin and the rest) will offer to whoever - Curacao or not: just going to lead to no payouts, delayed payouts and general moaning. But you can see why some players will be tempted, hard not to be when 100 autospins take 2 hours to complete. Moreover, the trusted old Slam Stop on DOA has gone as well. Lord, even on Red Tiger games you can't stop the count up to big wins, so that adds another 3 minutes between biggish wins.

I remember playing a banned game with still 500 quid left so what i did (knowing they'd take it all off me) was playing Viking Runecraft/Sweet Alchemy etc on relatively high stakes, filling them up as far as i could, zero'ing the balance and then coming back with a cash deposit a week later to play, roughly, a tenner and then getting the built up monies. They approved the w/d but one of my mates, different casino, did the same and they had it denied. Kinda depends how good their systems are at interrogating game play/staff looking for outliers etc.

Different casinos have different restricted/banned bonus games so, while Betfair might allow it, Redbet etc won't. If they're not on their restricted games list there's obviously no problem but, if they are there, may well be one. Easy Peasy.

And tightening up of the VIP schemes Before any operator makes a customer a VIP, from 31 October it must: Establish that spending is affordable and sustainable as part of the customer’s leisure spend Assess whether there is evidence of gambling related harm, or heightened risk linked to vulnerability Ensure the licensee has up to date evidence relating to identity, occupation and source of funds, and; Continue to verify the information provided to them and conduct ongoing gambling harm checks on each individual to spot any signs of harm. So, from relative carefree gambling in the early to mid 2000's, to: - Imposed autoplay restrictions, - Slowing of games to almost make them unplayable - Telling punters what methods they can and cannot deposit with - allow phone payments but not credit cards? Odd. - The rise of SOW and Responsible Gambling - Casino's timing you out because you played for 60mins. - Increased taxes, new one's on bonus's, making offering, together with not wanting to appear to incentivising addictions, customers goodwill gestures a risky business - Pushing of RTP's to Landbased levels - less playtime, less fun: part tax/regulation costs, part casino greed? Probably somewhere in the middle - The rise of ***** HTML conversions with probable maths tinkering - who knows. Undoubtedly some good things - banning of reverse withdrawals being one. But hard to see many overall positives. Now into the next stage - there's a consultation coming out re how to assess affordability - no doubt credit checks will be considered as part of this. Sheesh. Only so many blows a boxer can take before they stay down on the canvas.

I like the concept of WF, just not the execution. Almost like you can see the pre-determinedness playing out in front of your eyes. One of the few games i've actually had 25 losing spins in a row. Back to Reactoonz 2: the Garga's seem to be set to near enough default positions of 50x The lack of quick spin is really detrimental to the game - moreso this one for some reason. BoR's one of the best book games IMO - not scared to give 5OK premium symbols in the bonus.

They'd probably invoke a generic term such as : You must not engage in any activity which is intended to take unfair advantage of a Bonus, including by carrying out any Prohibited Act (as defined in section 7 of the GTCs (Improper Use)) Bit generic but, as casino's can't lay out all the circumstances or examples, pretty fair tbh.

If it's bonus banned, yes. If they notice - sometimes they won't, especially if you make a few deposits, play some different games in between. Essentially, you've used bonus funds on a banned game to gain an advantage that otherwise you wouldn't have had - really not worth it. You might think the winnings from a fresh deposit are unrelated, but they're not - merely a continuation of bonus abuse in the casino's eyes.

Wild Frames is literally one of the worst games I've ever played Book of Dead is probably their fairest/true HV game - albeit they stole it really, but still. The lack of speed doesn't help tbh - even the first ones a bit of a chore to play now, the spins take forever and it feels pure awkward PNG have such a ***** selection of games - they should start producing fewer, but better, games. If you want a High Variance experience etc you're better off with Novo's/Merkur/even NLC to an extent

Anyone fancies a stab at it, try Unibet - you get the high RTP and they're also running a tournament based upon X wins.

Garga's on 2nd have been, roughly, 4 50x 2 200x 1 250 x Roughly Getting 500x plus on the second is probably going to be difficult.

Wouldn't say it's bad; It's just got a lower volatility than the first so you'll probably see more X wins in the 250-500x than the first, which was basically all or nothing. And that lower Vol isn't necessarily a bad thing as it's quite clear to me from playing it that it can group the 200x wins close together, so more likely in this version to have something to take out IMO. Still prefer the first but i'd say a decent attempt. Far worse games than this about.

Regarding the Garga x2 - i didn't know either. I keep getting Garga and was thinking why's this not x2?

But the max cap is no different to the first one, which is actually lower than Reactoonz 2? I don't think it's bad actually: - Base game seems a bit easier on balance, - Garga's seem more frequent but there are far more non premium symbols on the board IMO when you get there Unfortunately we no longer have quickspin in the UK so it's dead clunky, like most PNG's now without it. Overall, there's more to keep you entertained and looking round the screen, more bells and whistles but probably i trust the first to give me double pinks....like below (which wasn't even the result of a Garga)

Not a chance a decent casino, once they have requested the docs, will approve the withdrawal, unfortunately (still think the use of cards in others' names should be flagged at point of deposit like some, albeit small number of, sites do). Don't meant to sound harsh but, if so cautious about what/who's details you enter, why enter details that weren't yours? There has been the odd case over the years that a casino will approve based upon the other person signing a declaration to say the use was approved by them, but they're pretty few and far between - suppose you can ask, just don't expect much.

TBH i don't have many good words to say about LV, aside from lying to me. Apart from that, fantastic! But, yeah, generous comp for those who can, and basically printing money. 1x will get you some free cash.

The UK as a whole should enter a comp for best imitation of a Panda because, between Brexit and Covid, they've taken a good black eye. Scottish Independence cannae come quick enough - we'll leave the Welsh to be their only friends

X multi's are the fairest probably. Maybe an achievement one - like how many 5OAK's in a certain game you get, gets you a point etc, sort of leaderboard ish etc. If doing the above one, a random raffle for a prize is always good to throw in. Dunno why, unless everyone is banned from Leo Vegas, why not many taking part in the current comp - basically giving away free money. And, when u hear gamblers complain about 'oh, they only gave me 5 free spins etc', it makes it even stranger.

Like a 2 meter distance obstacle course around Lidl's and Aldi: have to work your way from the bread at the back of the store to the tills at the front; get within 2m of someone, the claxon sounds and you're out. Sort of like a Covid Supermarket Sweep.

What's the casino name and secondly, what ID do you normally have? I know not everyone drives etc but, say when applying for a mortgage, did you have to supply anything? Each casino, AFAIK, has discretion to accept certain docs etc but generally speaking it is passport/driving licence (if they don't do online ID verification). Some accept birth certs, though i wouldn't be overly keen on sending that. Rather than get into a debate with them, however valid, i'd probably spend 70 quid to get a passport etc as a shortcut to 2k. The fact that you were allowed to deposit though suggests that they did some sort of ID verification on you.....so you can ask how did they verify your ID when allowed to deposit. Because surely if that happened, why the need for a passport etc? And if they say they didn't then tell them they've breached their licence terms - that may jump start a withdrawal being processed. Bingo sites are notoriously tricky when dealing with - it's like talking to a wall most times.

Where do people find these casinos? .Ag - Antigua. Yep, ok then

Aint clicking no link but don't need to. If folk need instructions on how to single click, spacebar spin a slot then your life probably has bigger issues than winning on slots.