Jump to content
icon Ag awards
icon
SIGN UP FOR +350 NO DEPOSIT SPINS!

Sign up to get the industry's best deals.

By subscribing you are certifying that you are over the age of 18.

This offer is not applicable to residents of Great Britain.

By subscribing you are certifying that you have reviewed and accepted our updated Privacy and Cookie policy.

Connect with us

Notifications

What's new

    Notifications
    failed to load.

    You don't
    have any
    notifications.

    View all
    Login

    Connect with us

    Adebisi213

    Members
     View Profile  See their activity

    • Posts

      455

    • Joined

    • Last visited

    • Days Won

      2

     Content Type 

    Everything posted by Adebisi213

    1. Adebisi213
      As usual with DOA, maybe the next free spins round. I'll pray for you haha
    2. Adebisi213
      Ooh sorry, think I missed the last one then. Just read a bit and came across this statement from Casino Estrella rep: "We are sympathetic with your situation and we usually like to solve these issues in benefit of the players, but in this case we really have no basis to ask CasinoEstrella for a refund of your deposit." Yeh, right! If anything I keep seeing these issues getting solved in favor of the casinos like 9 out of 10 times. Must be a very profitable operation, if a player wins you confiscate his money and tell him that he self-excluded and return his deposit. And if a player loses, then of course the casino won't do the same let alone a proactive stance.
    3. Adebisi213
      I think that's the right strategy with wagering requirements of that kind. I would just high roll and take the risk of busting out. Otherwise it will probably be a long adventure where you will bust out anyway. And truth be told, DOA of course is the perfect candidate for that task
    4. Adebisi213
      What's the max cash out for this?
    5. Adebisi213
      They are all from the same player it seems. The way I see it the casinos can't have it both ways, if they can confiscate winnings because someone who self-excluded won at a particular EveryMatrix casino, then they should be prepared to pay up all the losers who never had a chance on winning in the first place as well whenever that rule was in effect.
    6. Adebisi213
      Couldn't they a pick a name without any competition lol. Just tried to Google it and tons of other stuff comes up, it's prolly just a regional payment method like LL pointed out.
    7. Adebisi213
      Hot as Hades http://www.askgamblers.com/video-slots/hot-as-hades-microgaming-game-review/#review-55bc054c7528f72a2b8b4590
    8. Adebisi213
      That's great! I'm liking the cartoon-like images that accompany them. Some people obviously need them @ posting etiquette.
    9. Adebisi213
      Betsafe http://www.askgamblers.com/casino/betsafe-casino-review-r4307#review-55b248bb7528f7dd5f8b4567 Dash Casino http://www.askgamblers.com/casino/dash-casino-review-r1132#review-55b2507a7528f7bb5f8b4569
    10. Adebisi213
      Glow http://www.askgamblers.com/video-slots/glow-netent-game-review/#review-55b241457528f754468b4567 Neon Staxx http://www.askgamblers.com/video-slots/neon-staxx-netent-game-review/#review-55b274b37528f71f528b4569 Sparks http://www.askgamblers.com/video-slots/sparks-netent-game-review/#review-55b2dbdb7528f7084e8b4568
    11. Adebisi213
      Hi good morning Luciana! Me personally I never came across that payment method before. But it does sound a lot like Paysafecard or Ukash, a voucher you can buy at various stores in most countries.
    12. Adebisi213
      I'm just glad I'm not in your shoes Valdes or that of the AskGamblers mediators team. These situations are tricky and hard to judge upon when there are players deliberately targeting online casinos where they were self-excluded, while at the same time some online casinos will happily take your money until you make the "mistake" of ending up winning. Then they will grab an excerpt of their terms and tell you you're not eligible to receive your winnings due to self exclusion only to have your deposits returned. Regarding the EveryMatrix case I think the platform and connected casinos simply made major mistakes there and tons of players have felt the consequences. They should clearly state during the self exclusion process that it means they will be refused entry to all other Every Matrix casinos, including mentioning them one-by-one so there can be no mistake about it. Now it's almost like legal robbery in my opinion refusing players their winnings when they didn't even know they were self-excluded from another Every Matrix casino. So that situation probably angered a lot of players who were self excluded and played at a different Every Matrix casino and ended up losing, and eventually found out that they never had a chance to "win" since they wouldn't be paid out. Not sure how they all ended up handling it as I haven't digged around the complaint section recently, but I hope they found the most honest resolution.
    13. Adebisi213
      Just read through the screenshots posted in that complaint board. Exactly the reason why I don't deposit at some lower tier software powered casinos. I feel sympathy with the player as it should have been one of the greatest moments of his life, yet it ends up being one major deception. To a degree their explanation seems acceptable, but then you realize... wait a minute... the real time jackpot amount can be manually adjusted and triggered? They will obviously hide behind their terms and conditions. I don't know if the player is doing the right thing though by not taking the $1,000 offered. What else can he get out of it when terms & conditions probably have some odd term protecting them?
    14. Adebisi213
      Absolutely! It would be a major step forward. The way I see it now, the self-exlusion gets abused by both online casinos and players. I've read enough stories of players and casinos using self-exclusion to their advantage in some cases. It's a very serious matter that deserves much more attention in my opinion. That's how the Dutch gaming commission plans to regulate things. They will only allow a set number of casinos to operate within their license and each player will be submitted to a database to protect them against gambling addiction. It's the only right way to handle it.
    15. Adebisi213
      Just scrolled a few pages back and I'm liking Afi's odds. If I could bet on it I would bet on him scooping the Apple Watch Must be a 1 in 2 chance lol
    16. Adebisi213
      Haha well said Kate! We just want the "chance" to win, too bad the draw is not broadcasted live lol Would make it even more exciting
    17. Adebisi213
      Exactly, that's how I feel about it I don't even expect to win, so if anything happens it's a nice surprise.
    18. Adebisi213
      I saw many of yours Kate when uploading in Immortal Romance. Gotta be everyone's favorite game besides DOA. Well Kate there are another few prizes added by Valdes. One for the highest win, I don't think I have any chance on that since it will prolly go to a DOA winner and one for the most screenshots.
    19. Adebisi213
      I'm not sure if that form applies to online casinos Valdes. I think it's just restricted to land-based casinos in Malta. I haven't came across it before myself at any LGA licensed online casino linking to the form. It does state this: I "I understand that the Authority, assisted by all concerned parties, shall implement means to restrict my entrance into all licensed land-based gaming premises but it is my responsibility,"
    20. Adebisi213
      It's either that with me or 1,000. And yeah mostly the 0 of course since it's hard to get to 1,000
    21. Adebisi213
      Haha no way some of us could win then. We already competing against heavyweights like Kath and Afi who have more screenshots than anyone based on what I came across when uploading shots. But Let's see who's getting lucky I don't even wear a watch personally, but would welcome anything from Apple haha I found 1 more Wild Desire 1x Immortal Romance
    22. Adebisi213
      I'm sure I can make it 30 I'll just have to dig around the winner screenshots section. To be continued...
    23. Adebisi213
      I guess we're all after that 0 euro balance ! Only then we will stop lol
    24. Adebisi213
      My two cents... I think self-exclusion is pointless really. Unless there is one major player database used by all online casinos, it won't do much to stop a gambling addict. There are probably more than 1,000 online casinos out there. So let's say a player excludes himself from playing, he can just as easily sign up to a different casino and play the same games as the casino where he requested self-exclusion. I think there should be more measures taken in order for it to really have an effect. If I self-exclude at a brick and mortar casino here, I will be refused entry from all casinos. There is no way this applies to the online gaming environment under the current settings.
    25. Adebisi213
      Don't feel too bad Kath! We all been there before, in fact, I'm there more often than when I actually make it to requesting a cash out lol. All we can do is learn and hopefully not making the mistake next time.
    ×
    • Create New...