marius1978

I get this message all the time in different casinos, but support then verifies the number. Not sure why they didn't do it for you, maybe try again

Better to get there on 0.1 than to go bankrupt on 1.0

A brilliant final day of the month, taking the August profit even further and with a bet pending as well!

That's some big numbers How did it go after that hit, if you don't mind sharing?

I have noticed in several casinos lately that the replay function inside your games isn't working properly. Is this because those casinos run older versions of your slots, or is it something you are actively trying to fix?

Greetings, @TaDaGamingOfficial ! It is nice to meet you. To answer your question, I wish game providers would look more into how to get the theoretical rtp as HIGH as possible, rather than as LOW as possible.

Back to back wins courtesy of Bruno Fernandes!

WIth August coming to an end and a full week behind me of avoiding betting I could safely dabble again now, knowing that the worst case scenario would be losing a couple of bets tonight and tomorrow but end the month on profit regardless. It was a fabulous return to action indeed! And again, the Swiss were my go-to!

Limiting the number of active slots would be impossible to enforce. How would we know? It's not a special feature in select casinos - it's only that some have it readily buildt in. You can open multiple windows and play as many simultaneously in the same casino as your pc can handle. Not every provider though, like Push for example. I agree multitabling is a huge edge for getting the spins in, like it should be in what is pretty much a wagering contest. I don't mind ZvH, I like to play it too. But I like variation also

Its dominance would show even more if you included all the times it's taken up the top-3 or top-4. It just shows that the best option by far if you want to place high in these contests is to play ZvH, anything else and you're at a great disadvantage. And even though it really is an awesome slot - something especially Loceff can agree to, with his 3 fabulous max wins and all - it just feels against the whole concept of a "general" contest that you're pretty much forced to play one slot alone (and its clones obviously). We've seen in the provider contests that they are becoming more and more a one slot alone type of thing, so at least the AG ones should offer some incentive for variation and exploration. Remember: "All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy"

3 out of the top 4 is Zeus vs Hades. Sounds familiar? Yes it does sound familiar, because it happens EVERY GOD DAMN TIME. TWICE a month! Nevermind calling these contests AG this and AG that. They have one name, and one name alone: The Monthly Zeus vs Hades Chore

Can't sit up for the last hour and a half sadly, need my sleep before work tomorrow! This was the closest I got: Stormborn, 1,407x

Started on 2,500 - at 3,500 now. Didn't you know, I don't lose on slots

Just hit a 1,400x on Stormborn... Still time

Fighting till the last here...

Damn, I thought I was straight back in 1st place there but turned out I had missed putting it on 0.1 !

BB Floats my Boat, 1,265x

And I'm sure CT Interactive won't be very interested in sponsoring another contest here when this is how their games are talked about...

Power Pops, 1,257x

@TrueLabGames Lately, I've noticed your new releases tend to be at the 92% setting also in casinos with otherwise decent rtp settings. Is this something you actively encourage upon those offering your games or is that descision the casino's alone? I mean, your slots are hard enough to win anything on as it is, let alone when playing them on 92%

However, it came to an abrupt end later in the day and culminated in three straight big losers in the evening, taking a hefty chunk of my buildt-up bank roll so now would be a good time to take a break from sports and come back refreshed another time.

The run would carry over into Friday as well. Or so it seemed at first, hitting all three morning to mid day bets:

Why would it not be allowed, though. Maybe under some responsible gaming paragraph, but the bookie has everything to gain from players betting on no-value odds like these. Just one failed 1.09-bet, and it will take the player forever to recuperate, while the bookie risk only a minor payout each time, but a massive take once the bet fails.

Can't wait to go to Dubai! Doing my business on a gold toilet is the dream I never knew i had!

Congrats with reaching that milestone @EndorphinaOfficial ! Maybe you would consider celebrating it with an AskGamblers forum contest, winner gets a trip to Dubai