Jump to content
icon Ag awards
icon
Notifications
Login
EN
  • Member Statistics

    164713
    Total Members
    273566
    Most Online
    shaddy
    Newest Member
    shaddy
    Joined
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 5 weeks later...
On 11/3/2023 at 2:53 PM, Blackjax said:

More casinos have joined the list. Videoslots, mr vegas and casoo. At this rate I will be left with no casinos.

Videoslots and Mr Vegas blocked SA players since the first quarter. Was a bit pissed but I am over it now.

I can luckily play at All Direx NV still

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Fiekie247 said:

Videoslots and Mr Vegas blocked SA players since the first quarter. Was a bit pissed but I am over it now.

I can luckily play at All Direx NV still

Iam blocked by this two as well, no email no nothing to let me know and I have been with them since the beginning,  well  there is plenty fish in the sea. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/1/2021 at 2:08 PM, Afi4wins said:

Request for a casino review?

That's not even your intention bro...you want a topic to discuss new casinos amongst ourselves...so something like 'new casinos for discussion' would be more appropriate, don't you think so?


I appreciate your feedback and suggestion. It's essential to have clear and accurate topic titles to facilitate meaningful discussions and reviews. "New casinos for discussion" does indeed provide a more precise and suitable title for your intended purpose. Creating a clear and inviting forum for discussions about new casinos can enhance the quality of interactions and sharing among members. Thank you for your input!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, robjmiller said:


I appreciate your feedback and suggestion. It's essential to have clear and accurate topic titles to facilitate meaningful discussions and reviews. "New casinos for discussion" does indeed provide a more precise and suitable title for your intended purpose. Creating a clear and inviting forum for discussions about new casinos can enhance the quality of interactions and sharing among members. Thank you for your input!

It was an appropriate topic title and it was justified the way this topic has progressed. I stand vindicated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have always disagreed with this original poster's understanding of the word 'review'!

Look into any dictionary or Wikipedia and see what the word 'review' means...a FORMAL assessment or evaluation. Asking anybody about a new casino is not asking for a formal evaluation from that person just because that person has played there...that is asking for advice or info! A review is to evaluate something ALREADY WRITTEN or to write a FORMAL ASSESSMENT!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, robjmiller said:


I appreciate your feedback and suggestion. It's essential to have clear and accurate topic titles to facilitate meaningful discussions and reviews. "New casinos for discussion" does indeed provide a more precise and suitable title for your intended purpose. Creating a clear and inviting forum for discussions about new casinos can enhance the quality of interactions and sharing among members. Thank you for your input!

Why don't you implement something similar at casinohex, which clearly seems like another affiliate that you are representing?

We have relevant topics with meaningful discussion and had you been here around that long, you would understand.

Also quoting a post from 2021 just to teach some basics of something we understand/know  with one hit wonder post at the same time, has zero relevance... well to me atleast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Fiekie247 said:

Why don't you implement something similar at casinohex, which clearly seems like another affiliate that you are pesenting?

We have relevant topics with meaningful discussion and had you been here around that long, you would understand.

Also quoting a post from 2021 just to teach some basics of something we understand/know  with one hit wonder post at the same time, has zero relevance... well to me atleast.

Smart eyes @Fiekie247 I did not know he was an affiliate. Just checked his profile.  

Looks like mr @robjmiller wanted some validation as no one is Clicking his links from our forum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Fiekie247 said:

Why don't you implement something similar at casinohex, which clearly seems like another affiliate that you are representing?

We have relevant topics with meaningful discussion and had you been here around that long, you would understand.

Also quoting a post from 2021 just to teach some basics of something we understand/know  with one hit wonder post at the same time, has zero relevance... well to me atleast.

@Fiekie247  Oh come on bro!

Just because @robjmiller gave his honest opinion on this misleading and inappropriate topic title (which every AG member has the right to do so anytime), it does mean you can start shooting at him about his credentials outside of AG! That's not right and not cool either.

Is @robjmiller trying to teach you some basics on understanding bro? No, he is not. He is merely saying that he agrees that the topic title is rather inaccurate and inappropriate.

@Blackjax  said that he stand vindicated...by whom?...by which Court of Law...by which arguments for or against it? Just because @cocopop3011 allowed him to use whatever topic title he wanted or desired does not mean he has been vindicated. Does he really know the actual meaning of 'vindicated' as defined in a dictionary?

Sorry @cocopop3011 I simply hate it when things being said or done in this forum are not correct or are on the wrong track.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Afi4wins said:

@Fiekie247  Oh come on bro!

Just because @robjmiller gave his honest opinion on this misleading and inappropriate topic title (which every AG member has the right to do so anytime), it does mean you can start shooting at him about his credentials outside of AG! That's not right and not cool either.

 

He has the right to express his opinion, no doubt, but the context of his posts seems a bit suspicious for me, like using "Perfect" use of text IMHO of course. It does not come across as naturally speaking. Its like somehow the type of words being used just does not sound right for a normal forum member, its too professional. Maybe its just me.

Remember when you though Oliver cooper is a bot? With the context of his forum replies and messages, Its kind of like the same thing for me!

His profile website reference to Casinohex affiliate, hence I was mentioning it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Fiekie247 said:

He has the right to express his opinion, no doubt, but the context of his posts seems a bit suspicious for me, like using "Perfect" use of text IMHO of course. It does not come across as naturally speaking. Its like somehow the type of words being used just does not sound right for a normal forum member, its too professional. Maybe its just me.

Remember when you though Oliver cooper is a bot? With the context of his forum replies and messages, Its kind of like the same thing for me!

His profile website reference to Casinohex affiliate, hence I was mentioning it.

Yes, at first I thought @OliverCooper was a bot, by the way he talks in his messages, but that turned out to be wrong!

Honestly speaking, I think you may be wrong about @robjmiller, just as I was about Oliver, but who knows right? Anyway, just give him benefit of the doubt and let him say his opinions in this forum. No need to digress attention to anything else about him outside of this forum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see nothing wrong with the topic title personally. I allow you all freedom of speech here, I step in when rules are broken or things get silly (like now). 
 

Would I have used the same topic title with my fluent English, probably not, but we’re all different and I allow you all to use your own topic titles without the need to bash each other down for it. Peace guys, come on! 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, cocopop3011 said:

I see nothing wrong with the topic title personally. I allow you all freedom of speech here, I step in when rules are broken or things get silly (like now). 
 

Would I have used the same topic title with my fluent English, probably not, but we’re all different and I allow you all to use your own topic titles without the need to bash each other down for it. Peace guys, come on! 

 

I agree with you @cocopop3011.

Not everyone is fluent in English, but some like to pretend to be and use bombastic words wrongly. That's when I usually step in to make corrections. Like the use of 'I stand vindicated' for example, so I merely asked back vindicated by whom, by which authority? Vindication is a formal decision!

But anyway, like you said, not everyone is fluent in English. 😁   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, cocopop3011 said:

I see nothing wrong with the topic title personally. I allow you all freedom of speech here, I step in when rules are broken or things get silly (like now). 
 

Would I have used the same topic title with my fluent English, probably not, but we’re all different and I allow you all to use your own topic titles without the need to bash each other down for it. Peace guys, come on! 

 

I agree with freedom of speech part. A lot of stuff that people have said and done here on any another forum they would be banned. What Flatzem said afew days ago  and the way Afi threatened me a year ago, he still got away with that. Iam not saying they should be banned but it would be different.

I remember making a fun post of a 14 year old innocent girl dancing and Afi posted an indecent comment and still got away with that. In any other public forum a 50 year old man passing comments like those towards a 14 year old girl would be permanently banned. 

IMG_20231107_154956.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/8/2021 at 8:19 PM, Blackjax said:

We also need a way to cheer up our beloved @cocopop3011 she is having a tough time with this competition. She is so fed up because of the winners not showing up and we guys coming up with new ideas. You need to watch this @cocopop3011 and relax

 

 

On 1/8/2021 at 8:32 PM, Afi4wins said:

Makes me want to smack that sister instead... 🤣

This one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Blackjax said:

I agree with freedom of speech part. A lot of stuff that people have said and done here on any another forum they would be banned. What Flatzem said afew days ago  and the way Afi threatened me a year ago, he still got away with that. Iam not saying they should be banned but it would be different.

I remember making a fun post of a 14 year old innocent girl dancing and Afi posted an indecent comment and still got away with that. In any other public forum a 50 year old man passing comments like those towards a 14 year old girl would be permanently banned. 

IMG_20231107_154956.jpg

I mean the way the three of you have been carrying on I could ban you all 🤣 BUT…I understand that you three simply do not get along. When anyone over steps the mark I will step in, hide or warn a member. How other forums deal with it, I’m not to bothered about, the only one I care about is ours and at the moment the differences between the three of you is getting too much! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
  • Create New...