Jump to content
icon Ag awards
icon
SIGN UP FOR +350 NO DEPOSIT SPINS!

Sign up to get the industry's best deals.

By subscribing you are certifying that you are over the age of 18.

This offer is not applicable to residents of Great Britain.

By subscribing you are certifying that you have reviewed and accepted our updated Privacy and Cookie policy.

Connect with us

Notifications

What's new

    Notifications
    failed to load.

    You don't
    have any
    notifications.

    View all
    Login

    Connect with us

    pinnit2015

    Members
     View Profile  See their activity

    • Posts

      4806

    • Joined

    • Last visited

    • Days Won

      284

     Content Type 

    Everything posted by pinnit2015

    1. pinnit2015
      Maybe I’m getting too old but I’ll hazard a guess that the answer is -4?
    2. pinnit2015
      Think they pretty much can and knowing that they’re never going to be put to test in a court of law :-) Some of ones iv read wouldn’t stand the test of fairness, regardless if you clicked the button agreeing to them. But that’s why you should never play at said clip joints. Alas, gamblers are inherently greedy and the 500 per cent bonus offers will overrule common sense :-p
    3. pinnit2015
      I’m not a big fan of png as I may have mentioned :-p but some of their games are just HV. Tbh they need a lot of playthrough, so your play needs a x10 to get a feel for them. Gemix - all about the stars. I got mine with crystal warp. Viking - lure of Loki with a mass of red hammers Reactoonz - demolition lined up the pinks. All have same theme. A base game that sucks, you’re basically playing for the bonus. I can’t even call Jamming Jars cascading - lord knows what that is. But they’re no different IMO to any slots; if they’re paying, they’re paying ;-)
    4. pinnit2015
      Heard the weathers nice as well; well the suns always shining, on the casinos at least ;-) To be fair, it wasn’t that long ago that the MGA (or whatever they were called then) were pretty limp wristed and, generally, a waste of space but they turned a corner so there is hope :-p
    5. pinnit2015
      I don’t even know how you’d start with court proceedings - would it need to be via their banana republic licensing in Curacao?
    6. pinnit2015
      Have you seen some of the casinos, who have a lot of F You terms and conditions , that have a U.K. licence? ;-) I did offer my services to go through all their licencees, provide a report detailing my recommendations of who they should revoke, but sadly I’m waiting to hear back :-(
    7. pinnit2015
      Went on chat... whilst they have a UKGC licence, they’re not accepting yet. Start of 2019. Told them they should really geo block U.K. IP addresses :-) Good point - I don’t think there are hard and fast timescales but the GC have been saying that punters basically shouldn’t have undue restrictions on their cash. If that’s their timescale (I’ll double check) then that would fall foul. Double checked - they say ‘within’ 5 days. Compare to the withdrawal from Rizk I just had. 2 minutes. They really think people will wait a week? They better have 300 per cent deposit offers regularly and x2 wagering if that’s the case
    8. pinnit2015
      What exactly, if anything, have they said? Their payout speeds look atrocious - stated that it's one week for e wallet withdrawals? Eek They must have gotten a UKGC licence recently as pretty sure i looked at them they'd only a MGA.
    9. pinnit2015
      I'm not a fan of cascading as well but it's not due to the wins (in most of them I've played I've hit 1000x plus) but i just can't warm to Golden Ticket. I can see myself going 2k in deposits in it and not seeing a 100 x
    10. pinnit2015
      The only reasons for long periods AFAIK are: 1. Reversals and the Moolah it brings. 2. Cash flow - especially, for smaller places may wish to see what they've got coming in/going out. Though given some small operators pay fast, probably doesn't hold much weight. 3. Checks on withdrawals - only joking. Well, that's what some say/told me. Arf arf.
    11. pinnit2015
      I don't Win/win: player loses, Casino still keeps money. Player wins, they don't pay. Note: only the dodgy places operate like that.
    12. pinnit2015
      So are we saying that this monster win on a 4 quid bet wouldn't qualify? On a plus point i was able to confirm how far it is possible to throw a laptop across the street. Happy Birthday Mrs Jones at No 117 - you're now the proud recipient of a Macbook that has suffered a Bonanza Bashing.
    13. pinnit2015
      I'd simply invoke the conflict of interest ethical defence
    14. pinnit2015
      Just to add re Vikings. Videoslots battles are normally a good indicator of good potential - 150k plus spins: you'll see the top 3 places are 300 quid plus from a tenner from the good games (DOA/Reactoonz) and rubbish games around the 80 mark on average (most thunderkicks apart from Pink Elephants etc) Vikings last few are up there with DOA.
    15. pinnit2015
      All depends for me - I'd rather play at a casino with a 12-24hr pending period that offers cash back/offers/some type of loyalty scheme than one that pays me in seconds that doesn't. Ideally they should do both but if I'd to pick, it'd be the former.
    16. pinnit2015
      Nah, someone has a 500 x knocking about. Mathematically they have to :-)
    17. pinnit2015
      Thing is, slots have input from lots of people with various skills (I'm not trying to dampen your quest!): You need to be a mathematician in many respects, You need to be a visual artist, You NEED - and this one i cannot emphasise enough - to understand what players like/want. So many slots are obviously designed by people who have never played one, You need a bit of sound engineering (though i mainly play mine muted) All it all it takes a little bit of everything but for me, the key to making a good slot is how the pays are distributed in the game. Too high - you'll lose 75% of your player base or more and Too Low - I'm bored, I don't want to play it.
    18. pinnit2015
      May as well lob this is 449x on my biggest cash/x win from it Edit - i think this is one of those games that plays better on higher stakes....My tinfoil hat tells me that different stakes = different variances (believe it's perfectly allowed as long as the RTP stays the same). Maybe it is, maybe not and i just caught it in a good mood but the difference in this game on higher stakes was obvious to me. I'll try later and probably bust. End up cashing out close to 950 on this game alone in that session (gave quite a few 100x plus's afterwards)
    19. pinnit2015
      Only jesting - I’m a socialist at heart so I share the weath :-p Especially if it’s at a casinos expense ;-)
    20. pinnit2015
      #iwozrobbed :-p Thanks to Dan and Pragmatic and AG for the Comp. And congrats to everyone else, especially Fiekie for his sheer commitment to trying to beat the game senseless.
    21. pinnit2015
      Not sure how the complaints process works here but, in the event they do come round, might be worthwhile to just respond on the complaints ticket thread going forward (sure Valdes will say).... Hope it’s all genuine and you get that whopper of a bad boy withdrawal!
    22. pinnit2015
      I’m reading that as you can have accounts at all the sister sisters, just not two in the same. And you say you’ve only got one at Dukes? I’m not sure of their financial position but who knows if your win raised the alarm bells in terms of their cash flow :-) One minute is inconsistencies, one moment multiple accounts... maybe they’re trying clutch at straws :-) I’d have expected them to say : on 24th June 2017 you created an account from IP xxxx, username xxxx and on 27th July 2018 you did the same. Even so, again, happy to accept deposits. I see they’re blacklisted on some sites so not sure how this is going to go. I used to bet at 20 plus casinos - now I’m on 5 max ish. All with one thing in common - I know they’ll not try and ***** me (as much as you can know reasonably)
    23. pinnit2015
      Very few casino games are simple - the maths, mechanics etc. There are a set of guidelines that slot games must adhere to - I can’t remember the name of the guidelines but once you read that you’ll see how difficult it would be for you to design any games for a casino..that’s even before we factor in testing and quality assurance. Best option would be to go and work for an established software company - chances of you selling your own slot to them would be pretty low :-p I’ll have a look for the name of the technical guidance.
    24. pinnit2015
      LandL casinos used to only let you have one but I have about 4 accounts across MT sites, I have accounts with Redbet and Winningroom who are Evoke etc. Only time it appears to be an issue is creating two accounts in the same casino. Multiple accounts therefore within the Group or within the one casino? Doesn’t look clear to me. What’s the exact terms and conditions wording. You hit the nail on the head - the amount of money. The sceptic in me would say they had no intention of paying you if I’m being honest.
    25. pinnit2015
      As from VS thread, thought i'd try Vikings from Netent. Not a bad game - High Variance though. Will run it some on quid plus bets later. 737 x
    ×
    • Create New...