Afi4wins

@cocopop3011 I'm wondering if everything can go back to normalcy once again now that Askgamblers Limited is already the official paymaster? There's still time for a simple and short 1 week screenshot contest, if at all possible, cos I'm already so fed up playing those nonsensical Pragmatic Play games at ST just to pass away my time.

Received the January payment today...thank you @cocopop3011... thank you AG. Hope the Feb one would come soon too.

Very sorry about that Oliver, but at least we now know you're not.

Are you a BOT too? You seem to support and like every casino, yet not a single example from you why you like them.

For me it's very simple...I keep away from all Altacore NV casinos.

Whenever I see a new member posting and recommending a casino, my first thought is always "BULL!"

So where can we see your new winning screenshots bro?

Ooooh maaan, we've been waiting a looong time to get our payments, so really hope they'll come next week.

I would make a guess that the AGCCS Team is made up of a few Askgamblers staff, assigned to handle complaints from members, and probably assigned to do other tasks as well. I don't think any outside or affiliated casino staff are involved, and I certainly cannot say anything of their credibility either, but suffice to say, the AGCCS Team has gotten back many millions of complainants money so far.

@Ghostnipple Are you referring to Askgamblers' AGCCS Team? If so, then only an admin staff ( @cocopop3011 or @ValDes ) can give you an answer. We members do not know who the team are.

A HollyCON owned casino...

Your points taken @Ghostnipple However, the ToS states RESERVES the right...meaning, they can do it at anytime or whenever they need to, although is it NOT compulsory, not even upon any withdrawal request other than the 1st withdrawal. The correct way to state that ToS would be 'reserves the right to carry out additional KYC verification purposes AS AND WHEN NEEDED, AT OUR DISCRETION, for any withdrawal.' If an account is already verified, it doesn't make one more KYC verification procedure compulsory upon a withdrawal request, UNLESS, the last verification was done over 1 or more years ago, or the casino's management team feels that one new verification is needed (at their own discretion). This sort of nuisance has happened to me at some casinos before, but luckily not at all casinos. Only fussy casinos tend to do this.

...

That's the RIGHT way to organise ANY contest, my dear. I'm glad you're in the right frame of mind on this matter.

That would be very unfair for me, as you know, I only play with my 5 Playtech games. If this limit is enforced, I won't be entering, that's for sure!

That's the same idea I was having @AnOldFriend buddy, but with a limit as to how many times one player can steal points. That would ensure that no one player would lose too many points and to lose winning a prize.

@Ghostnipple I don't know if you are aware or not, but such complaints levied against any casino can be viewed and read by clicking on the casino review section, then scrolling down to the complaints list near the bottom of the page, then clicking on any one of the listed complaints. There's also a 'COMPLAINTS' button at the top where anyone can search for the type of complaint that they want to get info on. There's really no need to duplicate or replicate such info in the forum. Below is just one quick example of a complaint against Bitstarz casino that was rejected by the AGCCS Team. https://www.askgamblers.com/casino-complaints/bitstarz-casino-unjustified-duplicate-account-accusations-and-confiscated-winnings The next question is...how many readers (new or old) would even bother to search for such info just for knowledge's sake, unless they are caught in a similar situation? Experienced AG members would know how to get such info, ie, by clicking on the relevant casino review and looking through the complaints list, but new readers wouldn't know how to go about it, even if AG could publish a comprehensive list of complaints somewhere in its website for readers' reference. Nonetheless, I bet not many would bother to go through such a hassle to get the info they want. It's a lot easier for them to simply put forward a question in the forum, albeit a new topic, which would get much quicker responses and answers from AG and its members.

Ghostnipple is asking what and who is making up the AGCCS Team. There's no such thing as a Review Board in AG...wrong use of terminology I think.

Personally, I think what @Ghostnipple wants to see happening in Askgamblers (as per all his mentioned suggestions) would be quite pointless for Askgamblers to implement. Why? Firstly, only a small portion of gamblers out there would really be interested in joining any casino forums. They come to Askgamblers or any other forum websites only when they get into problems with casinos...no problems, no forums, and they'd just go on playing as they wish! Secondly, most newbies and inexperienced gamblers don't even bother reading about the casino's T&Cs or Bonus Terms before signing up to play. They just want to make quick deposits and play, either for entertainment (not so many of them I would think), or simply for some chance at making quick wins (the bigger the bets the bigger the wins). So they tend to start playing with big bets, without much considerations for casino's T&C or Bonus Terms. Thirdly, almost all of new gamblers learn through their own experiences and mistakes, only a discerning few would really study first all the associated terms and conditions of play, or really read up on other gamblers problems in forums to learn more. Nonetheless, learning through own experiences are usually more effective in many ways. They are other reasons too, but I won't go deeper into it.

@Igdekoy1973 And here you are YET AGAIN talking big and boasting about Betsamigo...yet no proof at all of the casino's goodness!

First of all, players reviews and their given ratings for any casino DOES NOT have much influence on the ratings given by Askgamblers. That's because Askgamblers Team has a preset formulation for checking out and rating any new casino, and only when their work has been done would a review on that new casino be published in the casino review section. There are numerous reviews already published in the casino review section here but it's not difficult at all to pick out the 'falsified' or 'copied' reviews - they tend to write the same things, in the same wordings or almost, but doesn't give any more information on why they gave such damn good reviews. Experienced readers with good common sense would easily detect and know such copycated reviews, so would not rely on whatever ratings were given by such reviewers. On the other hand, ignorant or indifferent readers, especially newbies, may believe in the very good ratings of such reviews, and may consider playing at that casino. This topic has also been discussed several times before here in this forum, so I won't delve much deeper into it.

Will do pops??? Will do ma'am!

Yes you can bro, but only AFTER the reviews suspension has been lifted, not now. Don't even know if any new games can be added or not during this suspension period.

WOW! Real lucky of you to win 5000 GBP...congrats mate.

@kayenne23 Bro, a suspension of reviews mean no new reviews would be accepted, UNTIL the suspension has been lifted. You should therefore wait for the lifting of the suspension before posting any new reviews. I am waiting for that too.