Afi4wins

I can only use Skrill for gambling purposes @JoAnnB cos most other ewallets are either not available for my country or are restricted for gambling use. So, if there's no Skrill, there's no play from me.

All 4 welcoming bonuses are very attractive indeed, ranging from 100% to 120% each, including free spins too. BUT...they don't have Skrill...AAARGH!!!

@jan duchau is becoming more and more like a nagging unsatified woman!

@JoAnnB Willkommen in diesem deutschen Bereich des Forums! Nein, ich spreche kein Deutsch, aber Google schon.

Well...well...well...my Playtechs are STILL going HOT! 2 Mega Wins in one day, both 542x! Thai Paradise - 542x

Safari Heat (10 Retriggers) - 542x

To me, RAGE is definitely a BORING game! Free spins cannot be retriggered, no win multiplier during free spins, no win multiplier in base game either, and how the heck does NetEnt calculate the max win to be 1860x ???!!! Must be the final accumulated wins in a feature game.

Game TRTP is 96.07% Max Win not indicated but not more than 1024x (256ways x 4x)

Have just tried playing this new RAGE game. It plays with 2-2-4-4-4 rows format, with256 ways to win. Paytable is ridiculously low, the standard for new games nowadays, and you really need to use the Buy feature to get the Free Spins (costing 80x bet). First 4 buys paid lousy low wins, the 5th one paid a 242x win. The usual NetEnt time-out restrictions kept appearing after every few minutes of base game play...stupid NetEnt for not allowing demo mode to be played in longer sessions! Overall, not interetsing for me, payouts are mostly low, no win multipliers in play...so, no thank you RAGE!

@JoAnnB I'm wondering...shouldn't you be posting in the English section instead? You'd get better responses there.

@Icy To post and upload screenshot/s to any game, make sure that the file name contains NO SPACES, ALPHABETS & NUMBERS ONLY. Otherwise, the process would just hang.

For one thing, I will NOT be rushing like mad to write whatever reviews I can write. I don't play elsewhere much, I don't play new games much either, so I'd be taking my sweet time to spread out my reviews to make them last longer.

@jan duchau Repeat any of your reviews for each different casino/game/bonus and they would be REJECTED! Each and every new review must be freshly written (no copy and paste of paragraphs or sentences allowed).

@jan duchau From my very own experiences over many years of slotting, all games have gone from GOOD to BAD to DISGUSTING! Only a very few remain playable to this day. Newly released games tend to play okay for the first 2000 or so spins, then they'd go DEAD for a long time! Proof? Play any new game, give it 2000 spins or so, and you'd get a decent game play...win or lose is not in question here, just the overall game play. Play more and more spins and things would become hotter and hotter for you...not the winning hot kind, but the swearing and sweating hot kind. That is the main reason why I stick to my few old favourites, even though they are now being controlled and regulated by blardy A.I.s, but they still can give decent game play and big wins at the right times. See my Playtech Mega Wins and that's real proof for you! Newer games? I completely DO NOT TRUST THEM!!!

@cocopop3011 What @jan duchau is asking is, if a screenshot has already been previously uploaded to the game section, but no game review has been done as yet, can he then submit a game review without the need for including a new screenshot? Personally, I too have got many uploaded game screenshots but without any written game reviews for them.

@cocopop3011 Many casinos are now restricted for my country but were available last year and before, so, can I write reviews on such casinos if the casino review page doesn't indicate that it's a restricted casino for me?

No. Not in my interest at all...not Street Craps, not cryptos.

An honest casino would close that account but would also refund his deposits. Why? Simply because the casino has illegally accepted his deposits when they do know that he was/is a restricted customer. Unreliable casinos, on the other hand, wouldn't give a hoot to the matter and would just confiscate everything and close the account.

@jan duchau Me, hooked to that Thai Princess and Playtech? No bro, I literally grew up with them...right from the day Playtech came online about 25 years ago! They know this and they wouldn't hurt me either...cos we are like a family!

@cocopop3011 Yes, that 670 EUR is correct, but can you also add in the 16.45 EUR Transfer Fee in the same invoice please? Thanks.

When Playtech gets hot, only Gamomat can keep up with the same performance! 2 more Mega wins from Thai Paradise, came one day apart...1264x and 875x.

@Slotfather408 Sorry mate, but I disagree with your opinions about @cocopop3011 ...I think it was/and is very unjust for you to say that she was condescending towards you! I too found myself asking 'he knew it was a restricted casino, so why the heck did he still signed up and played there???' If I'm restricted from a casino, I wouldn't even think of signing up there, allowed or not allowed! It was your choice to go against your better judgement, so don't blame others for it please!

Somebody...please get a CANE and give it to our @cocopop3011.

@jan duchau Here's my personal opinion. If it's a social tournament, like Pragmatic Play Social Tournament for example, the chance of winning any of the top prizes is heavily BIASED...meaning, certain preferential players (those chosen to play PP's tourneys) will always grab the top prizes, all others can only win the smaller prizes. I've already explained and elaborated about this some time ago, so no need for me to repeat it. It's up to anyone to believe it or not. In certain provider or casino tournaments, there may also be some BIAS in play, but to a lesser extent. Don't forget that many casinos and providers have streamers working for them and under them! In short, the chances of winning other small-prize tournaments are about equal...the players with better luck and better knowledge of the game would always win more frequently.