loceff13

Gets expensive quick chasing the qualifying entry for this comp :D, especially with players choosing to split 10's

Entry 13/Entry 22

Entry 12/Entry 21

Entry 11/Entry 20

Entry 10/Entry 19

Entry 9/Entry 18

Entry 8/Entry 17

Entry 7/Entry 16

Entry 6/Entry 15

Entry 5/Entry 14

Entry 4/Entry 13

Entry 3/Entry 12

Entry 2/Entry 11

Yeah you see it more in the slot style blackjack games with lots of repeating 20/21 combinations, so tilting because it always looks like a bs suckout

Entry #10 or #1

Live dealer tables are less tilting, some of the non live BJ titles you see crazy hands way out of line with the card frequency odds but it all matches RTP in the end. They are just lazy with the card distribution for the losing hands.

I get what your saying, sadly I was confused as my first 2 entries were counted when they shouldn't have been valid I guess and spent another $30-40 saving images with the same entry style. I would ask for consideration if they can be considered valid as a one off and corrected for future entries? The history confirms them as legit gamerounds. I also see the first post says: Any screenshot from the last stage of the game when the dealer reveals the cards (could result in a win or a loss for the player), as long as you have used the double down after the split feature. So should the screenshot actually be taken after the dealer reveal(their hand) rather than how everyone else is taking their images before reveal?

They do in the history Afi Entry 3 Seat 5 split 3's double on 3A Entry 4 Seat 4 split 2's double on 24 etc When you split it shows it as Hand 1 Hand 2 etc

Entry 9

Entry 8

Entry 7

Entry 6

Entry 5

Entry 4

Entry 3