loceff13

First post of the thread at the top

I just think it needs to be a consistent way how its handled so nobody is treated any differently if/when it happens again. I agree that laddering up is easy because they were next in line by xwin etc. As is you get odd issues ie if Pragmatic winner(500eur) was DQ'd and you paid out the same way to non winners they would get more prize money than the player in 10th who had a higher xwin than any of them.

Is the DQ/Split going to be a running rule, ie same calc for pragmatic situation?

Yes some platforms may have more disputes listed on them which are useful to read over before signing up. There can be big differences in score where one might be 8 here and <4 elsewhere or vice versa.

and again Potatohead does the same no comments for Pragmatic comp despite being tagged in this thread with days to be aware of the issue. The future rule for 5 posts within the contest dates is good, should make things substantially more active with say 14+ entrants for big comps having to make 5 each(>70 total) outside the contest subforum.

@Icy is a replay history screenshot considered a gamelog? ie does Daneski need to post their casino bet history or is the pragmatic(etc) replay overview good enough? I notice it's been accepted many times for this player in the past and I guess the rest of us are stuck in the habit of casino history screenshots @DaneskiNothing against ya(you have plenty of time to find the spin history if required), just wondering if things had changed on this forum. Nice max win on this slot elsewhere, those 250x bonus buys are too rich for me to consider doing.

Another 6 scatter(25 spins), 297x

I like Skrill just because it's easier to keep in your wallet and 2FA etc. Crypto is great but if you somehow muck up a copy paste it's a huge mistake with no chance to reverse it.

100x+ multi for~ 8 spins and still only 335x

I wish to retain the option to bet at the same cost per spin as other entrants. The 10(iirc) people in this thread who have named 3 currencies so far, 5 of those picked MYR and I would be the 6th. If close to half the regular players have that option I don't think it's unethical to request to match whatever they opt to bet.

^^Yes I have learnt to check casino reviews across multiple platforms because sometimes a casino may be an 8 on one platform are a 3 on others or delisted entirely for serious reasons(not taking part in complaints resolution etc).

Ok with that in mind I wish to change my choices to NZD, CAD and MYR(formerly USD) so I have that option, thankyou.

Can we get ahead of this and know your intent about people playing 0.2RM(MYR) bets in 2026 Pragmatic comps, is it going to be ok for that to continue? I was under the impression it was an issue hence the new rules but we have ~5 people locking it for 2026 where the same is going to happen until you get told to bet higher or get DQ'd for currency abuse. A hard rule now would stop future drama/DQ's etc and allow people to change their locked currency choices. Likewise if it is ok all players should know that in advance so theres no future fights over the bet size and we have the choice to match currency/betsize for the same reason players are picking MYR(I understand 1 or 2 have a reason to geographically). This isn't an attack on anyone and their actions(I did the same bets in Nov), just after some clarity on where the line is.

Looking at replay history across sites I've played(same % RTP). I ran hot enough to clear wager on 1 site for a $40 profit so it skews things a bit: 100x 104 200x 38 300x 7 400x 2 500x 2 600x 1 700x 3 800x 1 900x 3 I had 1x6 scatter and only 1 retrigger in a feature(no idea why it's included if its that rare)

Whelp well over 100k spins in since my entry and 968x is still my highest, pretty brutal volatility. Only upside is I managed to clear the wager on my latest deposit and got $40 more out than what I started with lol.