Jump to content
icon Ag awards
icon
Notifications
Login

New Members Area!

If you're new here, come and say hi! Introduce yourself, enter exclusive new member contests, and more.


142 topics in this forum

    • 1.5k replies
    • 319.6k views
  1. What's Your Favorite Game? 1 2 3 4 24

    • 576 replies
    • 241.8k views
    • 16 replies
    • 7k views
    • 19 replies
    • 4.1k views
    • 48 replies
    • 7.2k views
    • 4 replies
    • 228 views
    • 2 replies
    • 60 views
    • 3 replies
    • 276 views
  2. Vox casino

    • 1 reply
    • 193 views
  3. Nz sweepstakes

    • 1 reply
    • 229 views
    • 7 replies
    • 545 views
    • 6 replies
    • 1.9k views
    • 7 replies
    • 486 views
    • 4 replies
    • 323 views
    • 27 replies
    • 16.7k views
    • 4 replies
    • 737 views
    • 2 replies
    • 356 views
    • 1 reply
    • 285 views
    • 2 replies
    • 465 views
  4. Hey everyone

    • 3 replies
    • 3.8k views
    • 2 replies
    • 433 views
    • 2 replies
    • 353 views
    • 5 replies
    • 538 views
    • 10 replies
    • 710 views
    • 5 replies
    • 829 views
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      178209
    • Most Online
      273566

    Newest Member
    k3955111
    Joined
  • Posts

    • I honestly don’t understand this response. I have explained several times what evidence Casino Guru received, provided the link, and I’ve now attached screenshots again. So it’s clear what evidence I’m referring to. I understand that AskGamblers conducts its own investigation and receives evidence independently. But that doesn’t make the issue I’m raising irrelevant. I have shown that the evidence presented to Casino Guru appears to be technically impossible, and I’m simply asking you to double-check your own case in light of that information. Logically, there are only two possibilities: You received the same evidence as Casino Guru. In that case, the issue I raised about that evidence needs to be addressed. You received different evidence. In that case, shouldn’t the obvious question be why the casino submitted different evidence regarding the same alleged duplicate account to two different complaint services? I’m not asking you to disclose confidential evidence to me. I understand that you can’t do that. But simply saying that what happened at Casino Guru has “nothing to do” with your case doesn’t answer the issue at all. If I’m missing something here, please explain it to me, because I genuinely don’t see how this concern can simply be dismissed as irrelevant.  
    • can we cap how many casinos a player can use during a contest cause to have someone use 5 or more is not healthy.  should be capped at 2.
    • But again you are misunderstanding.  There’s nothing to disclose to you because we do not know what evidence CasinoGuru received. It has nothing to do with us what they received. So your question will always remain unanswered and unfortunately neither I or the complaints team can help you there. 
    • This has been the most busy comp since it started. It's been lucrative with the h*rny withdrawals from a few casinos. Thanks for the 250x red multi Zeus although I could have used another extra zero on that multiplier you bolted! Btw, the casino is not restricted as stated on the AG page. The unforgivable lies you did to me! 🤣 Gates Of Olympus 2500x  2625x
    • I'll post another hit soon @Afi4wins 😅
×
  • Create New...