Jump to content
icon Ag awards
icon
Notifications
Login
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Flatzem888 said:

it depends if theres a contest then right

that is correct sir. but i cant focus on the slot when i do mass spins. usually i do some work or watch a good movie next to the silent machine spinning

Posted
On 4/13/2026 at 12:13 AM, Afi4wins said:

The one thing I have noticed with most Prag games is that they play better during the first 5000 spins or so, and gets worse and worse as you do more spins. The big hits become harder to get as you go deeper into the game!

I've checked some random casino stats (criteria: they provides bet stats download; no brand mention, that's why just C). 

Methodology: the regression analysis of multipliers vs sequence  number of spin. Outcomes and explanations are attached below. 

Data explanation: 196 obs, only buying fs; to avoid the impact of big wins I cleaned the outliers (but every buying fs option gives 10 spins; so it is 1960 spins observed). 

So, C outcomes
image.thumb.png.2166cd7b2663e9d2d128c520056de45c.png

Explanation: RTP in regression model is going to the value of 66%...... Slope has a positive value but it can be explain by x65 at the end of session, that's why I decided to check it out without outliers impact. 
z criteria = 2 (95% of probability that outliers has significant impact) shows us the growth of RTP as well as the negative value of stat significant slope
z criteria = 3 (99% of probability that outliers has significant impact) shows us again the growth of RTP up to 88% as well as the higher negative value of stat significant slope (with higher level of stat significance) 

Disclaimer: there is too small amount of obs. But trend is obviously  negative.  There should be explained by the size of sample. But you can see the slope is going to be decreased. It is not good. It looks as a possible scam. We need to check it out with more data. 

@pragmaticplaysgd would say that it is a too small sample. They would be right. But are they going to share with us some details that will convince us it is just a conspiracy? 


 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
  • Create New...