Jump to content
icon Ag awards
icon
Notifications
Login

Flatzem

Members
  • Posts

    4331
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    58

Everything posted by Flatzem

  1. you went for the sweet 16 minimal, and not the catch 22 minimal deposit? or the wenner tenner there's gotta be some method to the madness when it comes to choosing which minimal deposit size to use on what particular day at what particular time.
  2. Stakers should just be called Fakers
  3. now about those side bets that many casinos now have for live dealer black and for online computer blackjack have you done any tracking of those stats. These are known as "sucker bets" but I guess if you are running lucky then they will pay off at times (sometimes in clusters you will notice). I checked my last 319 rounds (6 decks)(did not play the sidebets tho) and this is what I get: This is with PP 25:1, Col: 12:1, Mix: 6:1... and 21+3 using 100:1/40:1/30:1/10:1/5:1. 21+3: flushes: 19, straights: 7, Trips: 1, Straight Flushes: 0, Suited Trips: 0... if played 21+3 side bet on all 319 rounds would have been a loss of -97e, RTP 69.60% PairPlus: Mixed: 7, Coloured Pairs: 7, Perfect Pairs: 6, if played PairPlus side bet on all 319 rounds would have been a loss of -16e, RTP 95% Combined we get a loss of -113e on side bets. on 319 rounds. RTP 82.29% (this is if playing just 1e on each side bet) the 6 deck shoes should pay 30:1/15:1/7:1 and 8 deck shoes are 25:1/12:1/6:1... best is when the shoe is 8 decks for the side bets. grabbed this from elsewhere: In a standard eight-deck game, where we have the best odds available, we have just a 1.7% chance of drawing a perfect pair and being paid out 25:1, with slightly better chances of drawing a coloured or mixed pair, at 1.9% and 3.9%, respectively. With a 92.5% chance of not drawing a pair, and significantly high house edges on each type of pair, don’t expect to make a profit in the long run with such a bet (as with any side bet), but to play it for the thrill and excitement, in the hope of getting lucky every now and then, certainly provides some additional fun.
  4. from the research I have done about stakers they are a smaller online casino revenue-wise so I'd say they are having issues paying out wins and using various stalling techniques.
  5. 54.55% RTP, thats very very harsh, but it could have been worse if you hadn't stopped at 400 loss limit so look at it that way. That's discipline.
  6. It is possible they could be using bots to just mess up the flow of the table and try tilt players and make them play worse and make it a more of a roller coaster experience, but as far as if they shuffle the deck properly and legit then how would the system know the order of the cards, is there something in the shoe that can read the RFID of each card, surely not. Have you noticed the weird name players at all table limits, cause you may want to move to higher table minimums, where all players will likely be playing optimal strategy.
  7. if anyone doesn't know this but some lucky players had the good fortune of a world record 2920x monopoly live .... last night.
  8. are you serious, does this mean you won't be voting for Maneki (best new casino category) and Mr Play (best casino category) .
  9. if you hadn't broken any terms, then you should receive your money for sure. If they don't have some dodgy terms like "irregular betting patterns".
  10. you ever had people trying to steal chips from you at the tables, that happens too. there's a trick that if they put some glue on the bottom of their glass and then place it on your chip stack and saying good luck then they lift the glass and take the chip with it, other things like say you using cash chips at roulette table then people can easily take it off the table when you not paying attention. The thing about blackjack and the flow of the cards and players messing it up for other players shouldn't have an effect on your overall play but players will blame those situations for losing that card, it can go both ways, some player standing when they shouldn't can result in the dealer busting and you winning the hand etc. What it can do tho is possibly tilt you when you let it get to you and then you may play erratically as a result.
  11. now there's not really a need to when there's a casino in every mobile phone/desktop/laptop/tablet. No need for the noise/loud music/smoke/distractions/pit bosses staring.
  12. maybe they want you to reverse w/d and lose it, thats what stalling is for or they are trying to figure out how you manage to beat them for thousands on slots like starburst with amazing lucky runs time after time.
  13. now you do all your slotting on your mobile phone autoplay 1000 spins at a time while you go about your day/night.? there's no starburst slot at brick/mortar casinos but if netent decided to put their starburst into brick/mortar and not have them online you would switch to brick/mortar casinos in a heart beat?
  14. how did you start doing 10CAD starburst spins , what was the session like, minimal deposit and then reach some balance where you can start doing 10CAD spins? what went on here.
  15. like that saying goes first they came for the FOBTS capping stakes and I did not speak out cause I was not a FOBT player, then they came for the credit cards and I did not speak out, cause I didn't use credit cards.. then they came for the online slot bet limits >2.00 and I did not speak out cause I was not a slots high roller/streamer and so on it goes.. little by little they use the the totalitarian tiptoe, not all in one go because then people would see what is happening but you do it in stages.
  16. not good, this is more restrictions by governments (and some people are celebrating it) , there's people that prefer to use credit cards for deposits/withdrawals as they don't want to give casinos access to their bank accounts via debit cards.
  17. first he works really hard to turn the 10 CAD deposit into about a 100CAD (doing 20c/25c/40c/50c spins) then he starts with the 2 and 4 and 5 CAD spins (maybe even a 8 or 10CAD) till the inevitable 1K+ cashout, like a cakewalk.
  18. Not having played slots (except for FS) I however went and played almost a 100 hands of video poker today (Jacks or Better), but made the mistake of not checking the pay table before playing. when I ended the session I then realised something was wrong and sure enough the pay table was the 8/5 and not the 9/6 version. Thus I had been playing on a 97.3% RTP and not the 99.54%. Difference is that the full house pays only 8 for 1 and flush 5 for 1 .. vs the 9 for 1 and 6 for 1 on the 9/6 table. So they ripped me off on the pay table, and short paid me on that 1 full house and 3 flushes that I hit during the session. Was my mistake tho, should have checked the pay table before playing. Not worth playing the 8/5 version. Finished 1 unit up (was playing 1.25e units), and that was the peak of the session, while the low point was -19u (-23.75e) at hand #54. On the very last hand I get trips and chose to double it one time and the RNG gave me an easy double when it presented a 3 and I chose the Q. Without that double would have ended the session -2.50e (97.89%) but with the double ended it with +1.25e (101.02%). If I had been paid the 9/6 table then would have been +2.50e (without the double incl.) RTP 102.1%, and +6.25e (with the double incl.) RTP 105.1%. see how the expected outcomes are so close. (the values in the brackets show what you would expect in the number of hands that had been played, only flush and trips were higher than expected. RF 0(0), SF 0(0.01), QUADS 0(0.22), FH 1(1.09), FL 3(1.05), STR 1(1.07), Trips 10(7.09), Two Pair 8(12.34), JoB 20(20.21), NoHand 52(52.78) Day #10 completed 07.01.2020 Day #11 completed 08.01.2020 Day #12 completed 09.01.2020 dreamt about playing a slot (unknown slot). Day #13 completed 10.01.2020 dreamt about slots (unknown slots), received 10FS (value 2e {10x20c}) RTP 142%, (screen covered/sound off). Day #14 completed 11.01.2020 Day #15 completed 12.01.2020 Day #16 completed 13.01.2020 Day #17 completed 14.01.2020 P.S. don't play video poker before checking the pay table, better yet don't play video poker unless you are one of those lucky players that gets the royals with ease.
  19. were all your 25K spins on 1$ bets (all on autoplay?) so then you are running good on about 108% RTP on a slot that has TRTP of 96.06%. you found another cashcow for yourself, meanwhile there must be many others getting sub 96% to pay for your 108% in order for the slot to average out at it's 96.06%, you were chosen for the winning group so safe to say you can continue playing it and winning on it. But it may dip a bit here and there as the game gets older as we all know with slots they all do that, play good at start fo release and then go cold.
  20. for some people fuzzy head and blurry vision are caused by WiFi.
  21. But at least you are getting all these nice cashouts from minimal deposits. No one else is doing that at such regular intervals. The vast majority of players are losing at slots yet you with your minimal deposit/multiple casino strategy (yes we know you don't continue to deposit too many times into the same casino on the same day but rather spread the deposits over several casinos) are somehow finding ways to get runs that reach over 1K+ at very regular intervals like it's a walk in the park. I would love to see a live stream of your magical slot genius at work and I think hundreds if not thousands would tune in to see the magic)(I would make it an exception to watch it even though I don't watch slot streamers anymore).(Nowadays slot streamers deposit 500e or more bullets at a time and get multiple 100% match bonuses with low wagering and unhindered bet sizing, unrestricted games, so it's unrealistic for other players).
  22. Casino hopes the player will reverse the withdrawal and lose it all. other reasons are; they will take the time to check if there were any malfunctions, breaking of bonus terms, irregular betting patterns.
  23. when Johnny plays slots the impossible becomes possible, again and again and again...
×
  • Create New...