Jump to content
icon Ag awards
icon
Notifications
Login

Flatzem

Members
  • Posts

    4213
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    58

Everything posted by Flatzem

  1. Search engines show this result: After making a healthy living for the passed 3 years in the betfair casino specifically on blackjack I have received notification that as a result of them suspecting I have been card counting. I have been banned from that specific game. Obviously I have moved to an alternative casino but I do prefer the graphics on the BF site. Does anyone know who uses the same software? you can put that into any search engine where you will find a link to that forum. But it was someone called Escobar on 20th Aug 2012. some of the responses were: Tancred wrote on Sep 5, 2012: I don't think card counting worked on online casinos. They will also ban you if you win regularly, no matter how you do it. Gorgeous George wrote on Sep 16, 2012: So if they only deal you one card aren't you allowed to say anything? They'll be banning people for reading the form before betting on the horses next. What about football? You are not allowed to look at the team selections until you have placed your bet. Remember the house always wins, unless it's the one you're sitting in playing online. pattayaboy wrote on April 6, 2013: I now can't access the live casino.. Its saying please contact betfair helpdesk. Ive won about 1K are they stopping me playing because of that?? Cant even be bothered to call them because if they say im banned because im a winner and not a loser ill flip
  2. I've seen streamers get big wins and get big coins on that game.. but they play on streamer mode versions...
  3. I was not expecting this from you to hit such a hurdle as I consider you one of the worlds best slot players (especially when you have the ability to turn a small deposit into thousands on numerous times) . Good on you for taking a 7 day break.
  4. when dealer's upcard was Ace (23 times out of 319 rounds) the end result was a blackjack 6 times. Out of the 319 rounds, the dealer made blackjack 12 times, I had Blackjack 18 times. This is on a 6 deck shoe online computer blackjack not live dealer. Out of those 23 occasions when dealer had Ace upcard I won the round 7 times, dealer won 15 times, and push was 1 time. (I did take insurance twice and won both, I know I really shouldn't take insurance not worth it in long run unless you are card counting and the count is high enough to warrant it). Speaking of card counting online live dealer it's almost always 8 deck shoes and penetration of 50% so making card counting difficult. There was a stream I was watching last year and during the streamers blackjack session someone said in chat that some people have made many thousands doing card counting online at the evolution tables by monitoring the tables for a high count and only betting when the count is good. I guess they would do it in teams and check all the tables and then jump in either betting behind or if table has a spare seat. Don't know exact details of how they went about it but only betting when they had an advantage. Which might happen in some shoes when lots of low cards come out early and the count gets high enough and the shoe is rich in high cards. I have seen someone say on a forum that they got accused by some online casino of card counting cause they had won about 1K in a session and they banned him from playing live dealer blackjack cause of it. He denied card counting but was probably just innocently varying his bet sizes and just made it look like he was card counting cause card counters have to change their bet sizes depending on the count.
  5. masking their games is unacceptable, not explaining it is even worse and if the worlds best Starburst player can't win at their site then something must be wrong for sure!
  6. one unusual stat that I have found in those 319 rounds is that the dealer was dealt an ace 23 times and not busted once (I busted first twice so still the dealer had a chance to bust 21 times but did not bust at all.) Dealer should have busted at least 3 times.
  7. imagine mr play wins best casino award cause they hired some dudes in an indian call centre to vote like crazy for em. Just look at all the reviews theres dozens from India there (a restricted country),.
  8. so I went to have a look at the reviews for mr play at askgamblers and what I found was that most recent review was by some brazilian yet brazil is on the list of restricted countries. Something is not right there. hmm. then we see someone from India also left a positive review and India is on the list of restricted countries... then again another Indian, and another Brazilian, then two reviews back to back from Belgium, (also on the list of restricted countries) then another India, some from France (restricted country), Hong Kong (restricted) lol there is even one from Texas (big ol texas is of course restricted). loads and loads of suspicious reviews, India , Sri Lanka, Egypt, Venezuela, many have no country listed. Hey one of them listed: Anonymous Proxy as their country lmao.
  9. you went for the sweet 16 minimal, and not the catch 22 minimal deposit? or the wenner tenner there's gotta be some method to the madness when it comes to choosing which minimal deposit size to use on what particular day at what particular time.
  10. Stakers should just be called Fakers
  11. now about those side bets that many casinos now have for live dealer black and for online computer blackjack have you done any tracking of those stats. These are known as "sucker bets" but I guess if you are running lucky then they will pay off at times (sometimes in clusters you will notice). I checked my last 319 rounds (6 decks)(did not play the sidebets tho) and this is what I get: This is with PP 25:1, Col: 12:1, Mix: 6:1... and 21+3 using 100:1/40:1/30:1/10:1/5:1. 21+3: flushes: 19, straights: 7, Trips: 1, Straight Flushes: 0, Suited Trips: 0... if played 21+3 side bet on all 319 rounds would have been a loss of -97e, RTP 69.60% PairPlus: Mixed: 7, Coloured Pairs: 7, Perfect Pairs: 6, if played PairPlus side bet on all 319 rounds would have been a loss of -16e, RTP 95% Combined we get a loss of -113e on side bets. on 319 rounds. RTP 82.29% (this is if playing just 1e on each side bet) the 6 deck shoes should pay 30:1/15:1/7:1 and 8 deck shoes are 25:1/12:1/6:1... best is when the shoe is 8 decks for the side bets. grabbed this from elsewhere: In a standard eight-deck game, where we have the best odds available, we have just a 1.7% chance of drawing a perfect pair and being paid out 25:1, with slightly better chances of drawing a coloured or mixed pair, at 1.9% and 3.9%, respectively. With a 92.5% chance of not drawing a pair, and significantly high house edges on each type of pair, don’t expect to make a profit in the long run with such a bet (as with any side bet), but to play it for the thrill and excitement, in the hope of getting lucky every now and then, certainly provides some additional fun.
  12. from the research I have done about stakers they are a smaller online casino revenue-wise so I'd say they are having issues paying out wins and using various stalling techniques.
  13. 54.55% RTP, thats very very harsh, but it could have been worse if you hadn't stopped at 400 loss limit so look at it that way. That's discipline.
  14. It is possible they could be using bots to just mess up the flow of the table and try tilt players and make them play worse and make it a more of a roller coaster experience, but as far as if they shuffle the deck properly and legit then how would the system know the order of the cards, is there something in the shoe that can read the RFID of each card, surely not. Have you noticed the weird name players at all table limits, cause you may want to move to higher table minimums, where all players will likely be playing optimal strategy.
  15. if anyone doesn't know this but some lucky players had the good fortune of a world record 2920x monopoly live .... last night.
  16. are you serious, does this mean you won't be voting for Maneki (best new casino category) and Mr Play (best casino category) .
  17. if you hadn't broken any terms, then you should receive your money for sure. If they don't have some dodgy terms like "irregular betting patterns".
  18. you ever had people trying to steal chips from you at the tables, that happens too. there's a trick that if they put some glue on the bottom of their glass and then place it on your chip stack and saying good luck then they lift the glass and take the chip with it, other things like say you using cash chips at roulette table then people can easily take it off the table when you not paying attention. The thing about blackjack and the flow of the cards and players messing it up for other players shouldn't have an effect on your overall play but players will blame those situations for losing that card, it can go both ways, some player standing when they shouldn't can result in the dealer busting and you winning the hand etc. What it can do tho is possibly tilt you when you let it get to you and then you may play erratically as a result.
  19. now there's not really a need to when there's a casino in every mobile phone/desktop/laptop/tablet. No need for the noise/loud music/smoke/distractions/pit bosses staring.
  20. maybe they want you to reverse w/d and lose it, thats what stalling is for or they are trying to figure out how you manage to beat them for thousands on slots like starburst with amazing lucky runs time after time.
  21. now you do all your slotting on your mobile phone autoplay 1000 spins at a time while you go about your day/night.? there's no starburst slot at brick/mortar casinos but if netent decided to put their starburst into brick/mortar and not have them online you would switch to brick/mortar casinos in a heart beat?
  22. how did you start doing 10CAD starburst spins , what was the session like, minimal deposit and then reach some balance where you can start doing 10CAD spins? what went on here.
  23. like that saying goes first they came for the FOBTS capping stakes and I did not speak out cause I was not a FOBT player, then they came for the credit cards and I did not speak out, cause I didn't use credit cards.. then they came for the online slot bet limits >2.00 and I did not speak out cause I was not a slots high roller/streamer and so on it goes.. little by little they use the the totalitarian tiptoe, not all in one go because then people would see what is happening but you do it in stages.
  24. not good, this is more restrictions by governments (and some people are celebrating it) , there's people that prefer to use credit cards for deposits/withdrawals as they don't want to give casinos access to their bank accounts via debit cards.
×
  • Create New...