Jump to content
icon Ag awards
icon
Notifications
Login
  • Member Statistics

    166387
    Total Members
    273566
    Most Online
    alfavita8000
    Newest Member
    alfavita8000
    Joined
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

I’m pretty new to online slots


Lylyhannah

Recommended Posts

I’m pretty new to online slots, tend to dip in and out every couple of months. A while back I thought I was spending too much on Leo Vegas so I self excluded. Now I have an account with Spinstation (and couple of others). Does that mean if I won on Spinstation they could withhold my deposits and cancel winnings as I have self excluded elsewhere? Sorry if this is a naive question! I don’t ten to read the T&C’s. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most casino groups have a Self exclusion policy that if you are shut down at one of their brands, you should be turned off at all of them.

 

This is especially true of those who have an MGA license as there is the potential for some very severe fines for the operators if it's found that they ignored obvious problem gambling behaviours or worse yet, facilitated, enticed or encouraged an identified problem gambler to continue to gamble.

 

This only applies to sites who fall under the same corporate umbrella, there isn't as of yet a central database of blacklisted/self excluded players.. or at the very least if there was no one would talk about it because of the privacy implications. If I'm not mistaken though I just saw a headline in the last day or two that suggested the MGA was looking towards that sort of an all inclusive system in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In Short

 

No, unless:

 

1. You did it via Gamstop (UK National Self Exclusion scheme), if UK

 

2. Leovegas buy over Caddell/WHG (Spinstation) and apply the SE to them. 

 

Breaches of SE only apply if on the same licence but as THG says above, more and more casinos are applying it across their entire group - even if not on the same licence. Eg. LV and Royal Panda have two separate ones but the SE is now applied across both - not a regulatory thing but a policy they've obviously decided upon. 

 

PS - always read t's and c's, it will save you a lot of heartbreak in the future.

 

PPS - think why you SE in the first place and if you should be playing at all (not being condescending)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
On 1/19/2019 at 10:48 AM, Lylyhannah said:

I’m pretty new to online slots, tend to dip in and out every couple of months. A while back I thought I was spending too much on Leo Vegas so I self excluded. Now I have an account with Spinstation (and couple of others). Does that mean if I won on Spinstation they could withhold my deposits and cancel winnings as I have self excluded elsewhere? Sorry if this is a naive question! I don’t ten to read the T&C’s. 

And a good suggestion for the future is to read full T&C before playing somewhere, you don't want to be throwing away your money because you didn't take up 5-10 minutes of your time not to read all the details. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think self exclusion does not work if you're not willing to stop completely. Online gambling is a large industry, you can stop playing at one casino but the doors of hundreds others are wide open. If you want to stop, you need to stop completely otherwise self exclusion is worthless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/19/2019 at 12:14 PM, TheAverageGuy said:

Most casino groups have a Self exclusion policy that if you are shut down at one of their brands, you should be turned off at all of them.

 

This is especially true of those who have an MGA license as there is the potential for some very severe fines for the operators if it's found that they ignored obvious problem gambling behaviours or worse yet, facilitated, enticed or encouraged an identified problem gambler to continue to gamble.

 

This only applies to sites who fall under the same corporate umbrella, there isn't as of yet a central database of blacklisted/self excluded players.. or at the very least if there was no one would talk about it because of the privacy implications. If I'm not mistaken though I just saw a headline in the last day or two that suggested the MGA was looking towards that sort of an all inclusive system in the future.

ahah, that's true

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
  • Create New...