How long should a withdrawal take in your opinion?

[kevin.dorrell99]

How did I find out? 

That you are Ironman?

Heeeey...Robert Downey Jr is the best person to be Ironman...no other actor can take his place!

And he is one of my favourite male actors too.

I would recognise his face anywhere...except when he becomes Ironi-man! 

 

​It was a lot of Iron Man)

[Afi4wins]

​It was a lot of Iron Man)

 

OMG!!! I didn't realise that there are 2 Ironman here...one obvious, the other one, not obvious, hehehe. 

But this Ironman...I'd know that face anywhere! 

[Mobcasinos]

If your using bitcoin as withdrawal it would usually take an hour or 2. If your using other payment processor like Skrill or neteller most of the time I get my withdrawal a day or 3. If using a bank usually it takes a week in my experience.

[Fiekie247]

If your using bitcoin as withdrawal it would usually take an hour or 2. If your using other payment processor like Skrill or neteller most of the time I get my withdrawal a day or 3. If using a bank usually it takes a week in my experience.

Which casino do you play in?

[Astaroth]

If Odds Matrix Went Instant on their processing that would so rock I don't mind their group ....kinda like

Softswiss too just sux they took away mgs ... but the processing is fast

[spinspinspin]

I agree with you Kevin, but I think this great site should do something about who can make reviews or documentation, Again, unfortunately, I refer to the Miami Dice reviews. A player sign up on Askgamblers and on the same date he makes a review on this casino where he writes:

 

Fast payouts. Proffesional staff. Good loyalty program..

 

In cases likes this, where this is complete bullshit, there should atleast be a demand that you upload screenshot of withdrawal time date and time and the same when the withdrawal has arrived. 

 

A minimum forum post before being able to make reviews isnt a good solution so. 

[spinspinspin]

Another thing I think Askgamblers should do with these casinos that have so many negative reviews regarding withdrawals and when they also have 48 pending time or worse, there should be a warning when you go to look at the review. And in some extreme cases they should be blacklistet.  

[cocopop3011]

I agree with you Kevin, but I think this great site should do something about who can make reviews or documentation, Again, unfortunately, I refer to the Miami Dice reviews. A player sign up on Askgamblers and on the same date he makes a review on this casino where he writes:

 

Fast payouts. Proffesional staff. Good loyalty program..

 

In cases likes this, where this is complete bullshit, there should atleast be a demand that you upload screenshot of withdrawal time date and time and the same when the withdrawal has arrived. 

 

A minimum forum post before being able to make reviews isnt a good solution so. 

 

This is impossible! There is just no way we could monitor this demand, if a member has signed up to  casino and received all of the above why can't they write that in their review.

[fb_10153962658402365]

​It was a lot of Iron Man)

 

Yes..Simply...Marvel(ous).

[fb_10153962658402365]

This is impossible! There is just no way we could monitor this demand, if a member has signed up to  casino and received all of the above why can't they write that in their review.

 

Although I do I agree with spinspinspin about the suspiciousness behind many user reviews. In fact I did notice this with my previously mentioned casino. The first reviews to this casino, where made by two accounts that signed up on AG just when this casino opened for business. There are almost 1200 casinos here, but they both picked this very one - gave it a 10/10, and then seem to have left the building for good. No more activities. 

 

But it is what is, and I have to agree with miss queen of many many posts as well..  that would perhaps not be the very best approach to address the "issue".

 

But at least I would vote for a bit more comprehensive reviews by the users and from AGs side, maybe give us the chance to specify what was actually good. That is, split things up in "support/withdrawals/layout" etc. I might want to hand out a 10 on their support, but a 1 on withdrawals... 

 

And actually, that is why I personally hardly ever post reviews. Because I don't wanna mislead my fellow gamblers out there...

[spinspinspin]

This is impossible! There is just no way we could monitor this demand, if a member has signed up to  casino and received all of the above why can't they write that in their review.

 

No i understand that you can`t do something about everything. But regarding that specific case I think it`s rather clear what going on. Sign-up here and post that on the same day. 

 

Look at all the other reviews regarding the same mather? And support clearly tell me in the chat when asked "no matter what vip status you have, there still the same 96 hour withdrawal period". If he thinks thats a fast payout he offcourse is allowed to be pleased with that. But it is misleading when he dont tell the amount of time it took. Because the majority of players think 96 hour withdrawal time is bullshit. 

 

And when it comes to the vip program he talks about, the site must cheat some players - like I got - on the vip program and some not. Maybe he got what is supposed to give. I didnt. 

 

And when it comes to proffesional staff I dont even know what to say. Lying in chat, dont knowing what vip status gives you what and so on. 

 

Don`t you think it would be better that you had to show some proof? it`s not that hard to take 2-3 screenshots. 

 

I just think post like that member made is sketchy. But thats just my opinion. 

[spinspinspin]

Although I do I agree with spinspinspin about the suspiciousness behind many user reviews. In fact I did notice this with my previously mentioned casino. The first reviews to this casino, where made by two accounts that signed up on AG just when this casino opened for business. There are almost 1200 casinos here, but they both picked this very one - gave it a 10/10, and then seem to have left the building for good. No more activities. 

 

But it is what is, and I have to agree with miss queen of many many posts as well..  that would perhaps not be the very best approach to address the "issue".

 

But at least I would vote for a bit more comprehensive reviews by the users and from AGs side, maybe give us the chance to specify what was actually good. That is, split things up in "support/withdrawals/layout" etc. I might want to hand out a 10 on their support, but a 1 on withdrawals... 

 

And actually, that is why I personally hardly ever post reviews. Because I don't wanna mislead my fellow gamblers out there...

 

I think "1-10 system" works fine. Even though I gave Miami Dice 1/10, I still gave them credit for support and chat 24/7, the website and amount of games.

 

But you can`t do nothing else then give them the minimum of 1 star when they run the site like that. A site can have the best support ever, but what does it matter if its only trouble besides that.  

 

That`s why I dont agree with you regarding making reviews. If your review can "save" 25, 50 or 100 other players from deposit on a site where they either dont get their winnings or get a world of hassle, it`s a good thing.      

[fb_10153962658402365]

I think "1-10 system" works fine. Even though I gave Miami Dice 1/10, I still gave them credit for support and chat 24/7, the website and amount of games.

 

But you can`t do nothing else then give them the minimum of 1 star when they run the site like that. A site can have the best support ever, but what does it matter if its only trouble besides that.  

 

That`s why I dont agree with you regarding making reviews. If your review can "save" 25, 50 or 100 other players from deposit on a site where they either dont get their winnings or get a world of hassle, it`s a good thing.      

 

Well, guess you got a point there. 

 

But wouldn't you agree that instead of just a single "overall" bar with 1/10 stars for, having it split up in 3-4 of them, that are more specific. We could still give a low or high rating, but we could also indicate what it was that was so good, or bad. Considering we do value things differently..

[spinspinspin]

I think it works okey as it is. Even if you make a system where 1/5 is support, 1/5 is deposit options, 1/5 is withdrawal time and so on, people appreciate different things more then other.

 

For me a casino can have the best 24/7 support and the best bonuses and all the games, but if they use five days to verify an account and the same amount of time on withdrawals I will not deposit a penny there.

 

And as it is today you can still point out for example "withdrawal very good! Sent and in my skrill account within 2 hours". Instead of just writing "withdrawal" under the what do you like section. 

[fb_10153962658402365]

I think it works okey as it is. Even if you make a system where 1/5 is support, 1/5 is deposit options, 1/5 is withdrawal time and so on, people appreciate different things more then other.

 

For me a casino can have the best 24/7 support and the best bonuses and all the games, but if they use five days to verify an account and the same amount of time on withdrawals I will not deposit a penny there.

 

And as it is today you can still point out for example "withdrawal very good! Sent and in my skrill account within 2 hours". Instead of just writing "withdrawal" under the what do you like section. 

 

Maybe it's just me. But I can't get the picture here. You say we appreciate things differently, thus it would be better to just generalise everything?

 

I mean no matter what we value more than the other. I don't really think a casino with a 5day verification process and 5 day pending time would receive a 10/10 next to "withdrawals - process" from many users.

 

I say this because if there is actually anybody that would value a 5-day wait over instant, they could still achieve this in the "instant payout" casino. Simply wait 5 days, and then make your withdrawal.

 

However, with a more defined rating system. You might still give a casino with the 5day pending time, a 10/10 overall, because you value their bonus system so much.  

 

Ok then. At least we can agree on us being different. Nothing wrong with that. 

[spinspinspin]

I agree it would be a better system. 

 

But I think the biggest problem now with the rating system is that when someone sign up here, make a review and gives 9 stars like in the miami dice review section. A review that is so completly different from everybody else, it makes the rating go up. And for those who just see "ohh new casino, high rating, good looking site" it`s misleading. I assume its the average rating thats there and that makes it totally wrong that one or two reviews give a wrong impression. 

[cocopop3011]

I agree it would be a better system. 

 

But I think the biggest problem now with the rating system is that when someone sign up here, make a review and gives 9 stars like in the miami dice review section. A review that is so completly different from everybody else, it makes the rating go up. And for those who just see "ohh new casino, high rating, good looking site" it`s misleading. I assume its the average rating thats there and that makes it totally wrong that one or two reviews give a wrong impression. 

 

I know you've had a bad experience at this particular casino but if someone has left a good review, there's nothing to say that their review really isn't genuine dear.

[spinspinspin]

No, maybe its genuine and he is happy with a withdrawal time thats between 96 and 110 hours and no withdrawal during the weekend. But instead of writing "fast payout", write "got my winnings after 7 days... im so happy" or something. Because thats not a fast withdrawal for most of us. It`s just misleading.  

 

Just look at all the not so happy player reviews after him. But im done using any more energy on those scammers.