Flatzem

Mavs lost, 125-119... biggest leads 9 by Trail Blazers, 8 by Mavs, .... Mavs were down by 4 at end of 1st quarter, down by 4 at half-time, up by 5 at end of 3rd quaters, finally down by 6 at end of 4th. Need to take a break to figure out what went wrong.

Mavs lost, 125-119... biggest leads 9 by Trail Blazers, 8 by Mavs, .... Mavs were down by 4 at end of 1st quarter, down by 4 at half-time, up by 5 at end of 3rd quaters, finally down by 6 at end of 4th. Need to take a break to figure out what went wrong.

ok posting this in here as well: OK although I didn't post the prediction & bet I had last night since I wanted to make sure I had the evaluation method correctly aligned it was a winning outcome. Now then onto this new prediction/bet , and I am betting on the Mavericks to beat Blazers.... the Mavs are 1.66 odds (4/6) (Opened at 1.66 and fluctuating between 1.58 and 1.66). good luck.

OK although I didn't post the prediction & bet I had last night since I wanted to make sure I had the evaluation method correctly aligned it was a winning outcome. Now then onto this new prediction/bet , and I am betting on the Mavericks to beat Blazers.... the Mavs are 1.66 odds (4/6) (Opened at 1.66 and fluctuating between 1.58 and 1.66). good luck.

There were a couple of important things I did wrong during the evaluation, these two things have been noted and will be strictly adhered to for all upcoming evaluations/predictions. It's disappointing the win streak ended, (by the way it was much longer than the 4 predictions I gave on the forum).

Celtics lost by 8 (117-109). Celtics were up by 2 at end of 1st quarter, down by 1 at half time, up by 2 at end of the 3rd quarter then finally down by 8 at end of 4th. biggest leads were 11 by Celtics (middle of 1st quarter), and 10 by Jazz (near end of 4th quarter).

Celtics lost by 8 (117-109). Celtics were up by 2 at end of 1st quarter, down by 1 at half time, up by 2 at end of the 3rd quarter then finally down by 8 at end of 4th. biggest leads were 11 by Celtics (middle of 1st quarter), and 10 by Jazz (near end of 4th quarter).

putting the prediction in here as well as on my other thread. ok folks here to bring you another tip for the NBA. this time betting on the Celtics to beat the Jazz. the Celtics odds are 2.45 (opened at around 2.65 and has been fluctuating between 2.45 and 2.65).. and its about 1 hour 32 minutes before the start of the game. Game starts at 11.30pm GMT. good luck

ok folks here to bring you another tip for the NBA. this time betting on the Celtics to beat the Jazz. the Celtics odds are 2.45 (opened at around 2.65 and has been fluctuating between 2.45 and 2.65).. and its about 1 hour 33 minutes before the start of the game. Game starts at 11.30pm GMT. good luck

happy to report the Hornets beat the Kings .....(122-116). The Hornets were down by as much as 15 (during the 3rd quarter)... wish I had actually paid attention to the scores during the game I only did look once during the first quarter and saw the Kings up by 5 and price on the Hornets was 1.83 vs 2.0 Kings... there is a lot of value during a game if your team goes behind, this was the most a team that I bet on has been down during a game this month. Wish there was a way to check what the highest prices were during a game at end of the game.

happy to report the Hornets beat the Kings .....(122-116) the biggest leads were 15 by the Kings (during 3rd quarter) and 7 by the Hornets (during 4th quarter). Hornets were down by 5 at end of 1st quarter, down by 6 at half time, down by 5 at end of 3rd quarter and finally up by 6 at end of 4th. There was only 1 lead change and that happened late in the 4th quarter. I really gotta get involved in the live betting aspect of it cause when the Kings were up by 15 during the 3rd quarter the price on the Hornets had to be somewhere close to 3.0 I did take a quick look during the 1st quarter when the Kings were up by 5 and the price on Hornets was 1.83 vs 2.0...

I will put in a prediction on an NBA game as that is what I been mostly focusing on lately. So to start things off in this thead, prediction on the Hornets to beat the Kings. The Hornets are 1.66 odds (4/6). And that is what I will be betting on. Game will start in about 1 hour 30 minutes. Game starts at 11pm GMT. Good luck.

ok folks here to bring you another tip for the NBA. this time betting on the Hornets to beat the Kings. the Hornets odds are 1.66 (4/6).. and its about 1 hour 30 minutes before the start of the game. Game starts at 11pm GMT. good luck

various amounts depending on level of confidence. Minimum to start sports betting? you mean bankroll size, that is up to you. You can read about bankroll management there are various models: Flat Betting: The best and easiest way to manage your bankroll is by embracing flat betting. Flat betting is a consistent, disciplined strategy that means you are betting the same amount on every game regardless of your confidence level. Flat betting isn't sexy or flashy, but it puts you in the best position to stay in the game long term. A good recommendation is risking between 1% to 5% of your bankroll per bet. I prefer the confidence model and bet accordingly between various units. this page has a good explanation of all of them. https://linemovement.com/2020/07/09/bankroll-management-in-sports-betting/ The confidence model allows for you to increase your bet size in games where you feel more confident. Your standard wager should still be 1.0 unit, but you can increase your bet size to two or three units on occasion. (or 5 units). Also this: The only thing you’ll need to consider is if you want to go with the “to win” method or “risk” method. If you’re going with the “to win” method, you’ll need to take the juice into account in order to win one unit. That means on a wager with standard -110 odds, you’ll need to risk 1.1 units to try to win 1.0. If you’re going with the “risk” method, you don’t wager the additional units necessary to cover the vig. That means on a -110 bet, you would be risking 1.0 units to potentially return 0.91. In play betting can be good too but mostly prefer to do pregame but if you have a good prediction pregame and your team or player goes down by a number of points you can get a much better price on them in-play such as at half time and add on more bets. Also prefer head to head type of bets , i.e. money lines... as there are no draws involved.

happy to report the Bulls beat the Raptors .....(118-95) the biggest leads were 23 by the Bulls (during 4th quarter) and 4 by the Raptors (during 1st quarter). Bulls were up by 6 at end of 1st quarter, up by 9 at half time, up by 12 at end of 3rd quarter and finally up by 23 at end of 4th.

ok folks here to bring you another tip for the NBA. this time betting on the Bulls to beat the Raptors. the Bulls odds are 1.66.. (opened at around 1.62)... and its about 55 minutes before the start of the game. good luck

happy to report the Hornets beat the Raptors .....(114-104) the biggest leads were 27 by Hornets (during 4th quarter) and the Raptors never led. Hornets were up by 20 at end of 1st quarter, up by 15 at half time, up by 25 at end of 3rd quarter and finally up by 10 at end of 4th.

ok guys, I just placed a bet on the Hornets to beat Raptors... the Hornets odds are 1.76, its about 36 minutes before the start of the game. good luck

happy to report the Nuggets beat the Grizzlies .....(103-102) the biggest leads were 12 by Nuggets, 9 by Grizzlies... and there were 15 lead changes. note: adding in that the Nuggets had decimal odds of 1.69 (they opened at 1.64). I don't know the odds during the game as I wasn't checking them during the game only the scores. They were down by as much as 9 points (during the early part of the 2nd quarter), so their would have gotten to around 2.00 or higher I am guessing during that time in live betting. With 3.2 seconds remaining the scores were 103-102.....and a Grizzlies player missed a driving layup and looked to be possibly fouled during the attempt. Then the Nuggets got the rebound, and that player got fouled with 1.3 seconds left and then the game was over after a regular time out. https://www.nba.com/stats/events/?GameEventID=606&GameID=0022000580&Season=2020-21&flag=1&title=MISS Morant 1' Driving Layup&sct=plot

haven't posted here in a while but I will say I have a bet on the Nuggets tonight to beat the Grizzlies. It's about 12 minutes until the game starts... good luck.

One doctor said if you amplify the PCR test enough you will reach a point where every single person tested will test positive. whether the virus exists or whether it doesn't is now entering the realms of irrelevance because even by the official figures the number of people that go from so called infection to a fatality is according to the The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in America CDC if you're under 70 now 0.004%, even with over 70s its 0.26% and for that we have shut down the world economy and created enormous , this is the point, dependency by formally independent people and businesses on the state. We know for sure that the vast majority of people who are said to have died on the death certificate of Covid19 did not die of it at all. They died of other things, we've had people dying in motorcycle accidents, being hit by a bus, dying of cancer, dying of heart disease because once you test positive (with a test not testing for the virus) or a doctor says your symptoms are Covid19 whatever you die from, from that point on, Covid19 is going on your death certificate. In America for instance a payment system for hospitals was introduced as soon as this started, a change in the payment system where they get paid 4,600$ for if they diagnose regular pneumonia, and 13,000$ for every patient they diagnose for Covid19 pneumonia with the same symptoms and 39,000$ for every Covid19 patient they put on a ventilator which has got a great chance of killing them anyway. And some brave doctors are coming out around the world saying how they are pressured to put Covid19 on the death certificate when they know that's not the cause. Now we are seeing the mainstream medical operations like the CDC in America and the Italian medical authorities and say well actually the number of people we claimed have died of Covid19 is a tiny fraction of those that we've said died of Covid19 cause they didn't die of it they died with it or rather with a positive test with a test not testing for the virus.

clothing is non essential ? so that means anyone can go walk around naked outside ? if it's non essential to buy then it's non essential to wear!

was watching some video on youtube about all the stupidity this week there was a segment showing scenes about how the Welsh supermarkets have wrapped all non essential items in plastic. later on I went to look for more such videos and found one titled: Shoppers react ANGRILY to Welsh supermarket lockdown rules ANGRY MAN rips open plastic covered items A video has emerged of a man ripping open the closed supermarket aisles of a shop in Wales. The aisles were closed due to a rule from the Welsh government about people not being allowed to buy 'non essential' items during the pandemic. These include: toys, electrical goods etc.

what was the deal with @LUCH2020 wanting to erase his forum history. @cocopop3011 ? I missed that part in the saga fiasco. Did he think it would impact his case negatively with Mr Green having his entire story on this forum?

finished the heart collecting and chose be my angel for the heartstopper, queen was the symbol and it paid 15.4x on 50cent stake. what a disappointment. trigger paid 0.20 1st spin: dead (no queen or heart on reels 2,3,4,5) 2nd spin: dead (queen appears on reel 4) 3rd spin: dead (no queen or heart on reels 2,3,4,5) 4th spin: dead (no queen or heart on reels 2,3,4,5) 5th spin: pays 0.90 (heart appears on reel 2) 6th spin: pays 0.90 (no new queen or heart) 7th spin: pays 5.70 (new queen appears on reel 2 and 3) took 1045 spins to collect all 40 hearts to get a 15.4x heartstopper........ what can you say about that?