Afi4wins

Haha! Will never play there again. Hopefully they will pay soon.

Hi everyone, sorry I'm still unwell at the moment but updates on contests will be soon. Probably tomorrow. Thanks for being patient.

This issue should now be resolved guys - please let me know if you still get any problems.

This looks like a nice update for active members. I like that reviews, complaints, forum posts, and screenshots can all help users earn points. The Gold level with priority support also sounds useful, especially for members who regularly participate in the community.

My...my...what beautiful legs those are! 😇

I see legs but they are not mine 😍
Keeping my hopes up that those pairs of legs represents the amount of contests we have soon.

Let me make a guess...I expect the 250 EUR screenshot contest to start this coming week, probably on the 9th June, then followed by the 750 Premium contest from  the 17th.
Usually contest would start on a Monday, but knowing our @cocopop3011 is currently not that well, so I expect some delays in the starting dates.
Provider contest? Hmmm...hopefully our good old reliable Pragmatic can provide us with one as usual.
Keep your fingers crossed...make that your legs too! 🤣

10 USDC Welcome Quests are open for new P2P players. 
Don't leave the bonus on the table.
Start your match today!

Are those actually safe to use with real crypto, though?

Stake is usually the safer pick. The VIP progression feels smoother and the rewards are more consistent.

I previously reported a vulnerability exposing their customers' data through the payment gateway, but I was ignored. For the sake of public awareness, I am posting this here, and a formal complaint will be submitted to their Curacao license issuer.

Dear Security and Compliance Team,
I am writing to report a severe security vulnerability discovered within the paymentpulse.online payment gateway architecture, resulting in unauthorized exposure of Personally Identifiable Information (PII) and internal transactional infrastructure.
1. The Vulnerability & Session Bypass: The platform’s endpoint responsible for generating and displaying invoice states (/api/v1/getOrderStatus / public billing page) entirely lacks session validation and token authorization constraints. Anyone can query raw transaction logs without active user session cookies.
Crucially, as shown in the extracted logs, even when a transaction lifecycle is completely terminated or has expired—indicated by a negative timeout state ("timeout": -2365202, "status": "FAIL")—the backend continues to expose complete internal transaction objects to the public internet.
Live Vulnerable Invoice Example: An unauthenticated third party can directly access live transaction payloads by visiting endpoints such as: [https://transfer.paymentpulse.online/payment/mpf/h2h#d64a2588-a3b2-b6e4-8e94-241c2f424a75](https://transfer.paymentpulse.online/payment/mpf/h2h#d64a2588-a3b2-b6e4-8e94-241c2f424a75)
2. Leakage of Player Identifiers (PII): The API returns raw text inside the "description" object containing direct references to the user’s database entry linked to the invoice above:
"description": "Account+deposit+1660417699"
This parameter openly links a public financial transaction directly to a specific player’s Account ID (1660417699) on the partner platform. Because the partner's account allocation relies on sequential, predictable linear metrics, this architecture transforms a simple info leak into a high-severity IDOR (Insecure Direct Object Reference) flaw. It permits malicious third parties to de-anonymize players, track specific platform deposit volumes, and map out active user databases.
3. Gateway Architecture and Method Leakage: The unauthenticated payload also exposes critical backend configurations, including tracking parameters and automotive communication channels:
"trans_id": "100706407103", "number": "21525799293"
"payment_method": "P2PALFAPAY" (confirming unmonitored P2P payment routing).
Exposing active infrastructure endpoints, routing methods, and direct client database IDs to unauthenticated clients violates strict financial compliance standards, including data minimization guidelines under GDPR and security baselines required for handling peer-to-peer card transactions.
Bug Bounty and Collaboration: I conduct independent security analysis across modern payment processing solutions. Given that this architectural leak undermines the transactional privacy of thousands of user accounts and partner merchants, I believe it warrants rapid intervention.
I am available for structured cooperation and ask that your engineering team reviews this report for a reward allocation under a standard Bug Bounty model for providing the data parameters and vulnerable endpoints.
Screenshots:
1)https://postimg.cc/k6tmGZkh
2)https://postimg.cc/gw7pYdBR
I have attached the unedited network logs and screenshots validating the session-less data extraction. I look forward to your acknowledgment and your planned remediation schedule.
Best regards,
Virginia

I'm comparing the VIP programs on Stake and Roobet. Which is better for a mid-tier player?  

I've only played the Playtech's football games many many years ago and haven't played them ever since. Don't intend to either.

I agree......with myself! A wonderful change is recommended from the long delay! ☺️
And now to find big wins on Train To Seoul!

Final Leaderboard
1st @ales200 1610x (250 EUR) 
2nd @marius1978 1591x (200 EUR) 
3rd @Maiwen 1572x (100 EUR) 
4th @loceff13 1502x (75 EUR) 
5th @Afi4wins 892x (50 EUR) 
6th @Flatzem888 602x (40 EUR) 
7th @Icy 445x (35 EUR) 

Final Leaderboard
1st @marius1978 2145x (500 EUR)
2nd @formerPokerpro 1322x (350 EUR)
3rd @Daneski 1016x (250 EUR)
4th @lucks_maximus 955x (200 EUR)
5th @loceff13 804x (150 EUR)
6th @Flatzem888 590x (120 EUR)
7th @kuff 466x (110 EUR)
8th @ales200 386x (110 EUR)
9th @Vezynchik 381x (110 EUR)
10th @Ultras34 372x (100 EUR)
-------------------------------------------
@bricefox 489x  
@Potatohead 376x
@Maiwen 215x 
@Icy 160x 
@Blackjax 118x 

Unofficial Final Leaderboard (Updated)
1st @ales200 1610x (250 EUR) 
2nd @marius1978 1591x (200 EUR) 
3rd @Maiwen 1572x (100 EUR) 
4th @loceff13 1502x (75 EUR) 
5th @Afi4wins 892x (50 EUR) 
6th @Flatzem888 602x (40 EUR) 
7th @Icy 445x (35 EUR) 
------------------------------------------- 
8th @Potatohead 675x
 @Potatohead You did not complete the 5 posts requirement so your final entry does not qualify to win.
Congratulations to all winners!  

(Whispers) I'll change back on Monday 😁

How dare you keep changing your nicknames and try to fool members! 😜
@cocopop3011 Honestly speaking, I think nicknames can only be changed one at a time, up to a max of 3 times. I think there was this rule during Valdes's time but I can't remember now.

Unofficial Final Leaderboard
1st @marius1978 2145x (500 EUR)
2nd @formerPokerpro 1322x (350 EUR)
3rd @Daneski 1016x (250 EUR)
4th @lucks_maximus 955x (200 EUR)
5th @loceff13 804x (150 EUR)
6th @Flatzem888 590x (120 EUR)
7th @kuff 466x (110 EUR)
8th @ales200 386x (110 EUR)
9th @Vezynchik 381x (110 EUR)
10th @Ultras34 372x (100 EUR)
-------------------------------------------
@bricefox 489x  
@Potatohead 376x
@Maiwen 215x 
@Icy 160x 
@Blackjax 118x 
@Potatohead You did not complete the 5 posts requirement, so your final entry does not qualify to win.
@bricefox You also did not complete the 5 posts requirement, so your entry does not qualify to win.
Congratulations to all winners!  

Unofficial Final Leaderboard
1st @marius1978 2145x (500 EUR)
2nd @formerPokerpro 1322x (350 EUR)
3rd @Daneski 1016x (250 EUR)
4th @lucks_maximus 955x (200 EUR)
5th @loceff13 804x (150 EUR)
6th @Flatzem888 590x (120 EUR)
7th @kuff 466x (110 EUR)
8th @ales200 386x (110 EUR)
9th @Vezynchik 381x (110 EUR)
10th @Ultras34 372x (100 EUR)
-------------------------------------------
@bricefox 489x  
@Potatohead 376x
@Maiwen 215x 
@Icy 160x 
@Blackjax 118x 
@Potatohead You did not complete the 5 posts requirement, so your final entry does not qualify to win.
@bricefox You also did not complete the 5 posts requirement, so your entry does not qualify to win.
Congratulations to all winners!  

A lot of these so-called “crypto recovery experts” raise major red flags, especially when they advertise guaranteed recovery rates or extremely high success percentages. Unfortunately, many scam victims end up getting targeted a second time by recovery scams that promise to retrieve lost funds for upfront fees or personal information. Real recovery efforts usually involve law enforcement, blockchain analysis, exchanges, and legal processes  not miracle guarantees. Anyone dealing with crypto theft should be very cautious, independently verify companies, and avoid trusting emotional testimonials or claims that sound too perfect to be true.

Unofficial Final Leaderboard
1st @marius1978 2145x (500 EUR)
2nd @formerPokerpro 1322x (350 EUR)
3rd @Daneski 1016x (250 EUR)
4th @lucks_maximus 955x (200 EUR)
5th @loceff13 804x (150 EUR)
6th @Flatzem888 590x (120 EUR)
7th @kuff 466x (110 EUR)
8th @ales200 386x (110 EUR)
9th @Vezynchik 381x (110 EUR)
10th @Ultras34 372x (100 EUR)
-------------------------------------------
@bricefox 489x  
@Potatohead 376x
@Maiwen 215x 
@Icy 160x 
@Blackjax 118x 
@Potatohead You did not complete the 5 posts requirement, so your final entry does not qualify to win.
@bricefox You also did not complete the 5 posts requirement, so your entry does not qualify to win.
Congratulations to all winners!  

Unofficial Final Leaderboard
1st @marius1978 2145x (500 EUR)
2nd @formerPokerpro 1322x (350 EUR)
3rd @Daneski 1016x (250 EUR)
4th @lucks_maximus 955x (200 EUR)
5th @loceff13 804x (150 EUR)
6th @Flatzem888 590x (120 EUR)
7th @kuff 466x (110 EUR)
8th @ales200 386x (110 EUR)
9th @Vezynchik 381x (110 EUR)
10th @Ultras34 372x (100 EUR)
-------------------------------------------
@bricefox 489x  
@Potatohead 376x
@Maiwen 215x 
@Icy 160x 
@Blackjax 118x 
@Potatohead You did not complete the 5 posts requirement, so your final entry does not qualify to win.
@bricefox You also did not complete the 5 posts requirement, so your entry does not qualify to win.
Congratulations to all winners!