Jeanke08

Okay, knowing the specs you're seeking from a casino, I can watch out as well if I do come across let's say even 90% matching specs, I'll give you a shout.

That's exactly what I meant, now your gettiing it. But by finding such grammatical twists and turns, you can unfold the shenanigans, bring them to light and hopefully expect that AG talks to the casino about this matter....or a review unveiling this prevents other players from making the same mistake. Which reminds me, @cocopop3011 you said that you would inform the team about the blunder here on AG...do they contact the casino as well and advise to rephrase to avoid misunderstandings in the future. I mean, If any other case arises, I don't know in whatever context but if it comes to light AG didn't do anything, it could be considered negligence despite prior knowledge to safeguard players. What's more, for affiliates there are Awards handed out as well...if I'm correct these things could be used against AG itself and affect the place you end up as affiliate. I guess being/getting number one is always the intent so....it would be negligence from AG itself in favour of AG.

something you wanna know beforehand...just ask bro'

sorry

If anybody wants some pre-review information about the casino and gameplay...just ask. Their conditions are very, very good. https://www.askgamblers.com/online-casinos/reviews/crashino-casino

As do I and yet...they baited me with simple wordplay. Good to hear you're a smart one who won't let this happen to him but reality...many others will and not because they aren't reading T&C but simply by the smoke and mirrors of intended misleading/to mislead, terminology used Also When I checked English dictionaries online form Cambridge and Oxford together with one Financial founded descriptive dictionary I found loopholes, inconcistities better, in their usage of the word 'funds'. It's all about the bigger context they're paraphrasing it in.

Sorry to say dude, but last week you were full of Winscore and decided to throw them out and yet...you deposited and played again I can't be more straightforward and say, you did this to yourself and I can't be emphatic towards that fact. Sorry

I believe people need to see this...isf you know they only have +2000 slots...this extensive list excluded almost half of their games..on top of the WR amount and only 48hours to clear. BullsButt can $uck my d1ck, I wanna spread the word as with all those other casinos not worth spending even a single braincell on. Ban those m0f0's! I don't need to contact support live after seeing that extensive list...although I only played 3 games, which 2 of them counted yesterday. Plus it is mentioned, they can change, adapt,add at will without prior notice so the circle of we're gonna bleed you dry is complete, yet again.... Seriousely, Why allow these casino's on AG, why promote them...the new cr@p is running ablaze ontop of the old crappy ones. It's $hite of the highest Pedigree BullsButtPal

As a fact yes there is: All games apparently Below is the extensive list of Slots and other Games Carrying 0% wagering with an active bonus. <List removed>

Huh...I didn't read anything about it being at Winscore again....

I just did a search on 'Funds' and/vs 'total balance' in dictionary sites and especially the financial ones dare me to say they couldn't have used that.

@cocopop3011 1. * The amount of providers: they feature loads of providers but most of them are near empty. BTG for example (3slots), Push Gaming (22 slots), Playson (24 slots) 2. Pragmatic slots: about 1/4 is missing, the cool games ofcourse...no 'Curse of the Werewolf', 'Blazing Wilds Megaways', Thor & Odin Megaways. 3. All RTP's I've come across aren't conform with the RTP's you can check on any providers website. They are lowered by 2-3%...which is huge! - Wagering requirements...don't be fooled. It's afficiated as 40x (T&C first deposit welcome bonus) on Bullsbet and here on AG but believe someone who actually played there: it's 80x / 40x d+b 4. You only get 2 days to wager which is ridiculous with such a high wagering. For example: When I managed to reach 54,68 % WR done -I thought I concluded wagering- my account balance was €250 -initial deposit €28-), I needed another € 1015 of wagering....but when reaching € 0.54 I still had to wager € 943 (7,88% wagered) So losing € 250 counts as € 72 wagered...Aheum!!!!! Games which do not count for wagering can't be opened due to active bonus so that's not the problem. So can someone please solve this arithmetic deviation without concluding their system is corrupt. 5. My last pov: the two days you get for wagering: just try in one day if you are stupid to try Bullsbet like me because the second day none of the bonuses rose above +25x betsize. 6. I better downgrade from three to two stars after summing up all of this.

Ow Afi, check my comments where I adviced to install and use 'PopUpOff' extension, primary because it blocks overlays. And maybe the 'NoClickJack' extension as well. I promise for 99% this won't happen again with those 2e xtensions.

In that case you can get that game ouf of game history, that's what I asked it for. The no screenshot taken argument is irrelevant, in that case as you can take one of the replay or just that one line in betting history which shows €100

@cocopop3011 and what about this? For correct communication...at this point I dropped the idea of claiming my money back, I just wanna put BullsButt in the ground.

That was a sarcastic joke Afi. I know I normally add enough emoji's or meme's to visualize the sarcasm but I'm tired today. No need for the hahaha, you're only showing sociopathic traits like that...especially for the biggest cry baby when you are disadvanteged.

I would never buy 40x d+b, conclude wagering in 2 days but all signs show x40....it's not because you interpreted this after having read the facts that you're correct, it's not coz' now you're unwillingly biased because of the data ingested into your brain. You would've made the same mistake, seeing 40x @ AG ... seeing 40x at BullsButt, everyone would. Pure smoke and mirrros and once again a misleading textual description

ah, it just changed...you didn't play the €100 and corrected it back

I could demand my money back from AG because of the misinformation

And what about the WR which is way off. Aside the money, which they can stuff up their BullsBut, will acomplaint get this casino blacklisted / terminated? When you wager €250, leave the winnings aside...their should be at least €250 subtracted from that still to wager amount...right, then why only €70 EDIT: nobody downloaded the .txt file which explains in detail....good to know that, super community spirit here. (For all you Micro$oft Window$ users, '.txt files can't give you a virus/malware/spyware/whatever!!!)'

you have a screenshot of that?

@cocopop3011What are the chances of me getting my deposit back through a complaint, taking the last WR screenshots to mind and please read the dislike.txt (used in the review I just posted) as well. It gives a broader image for your consideration

To keep me entertained and not be bored I like nice graphic slots yes.... Sure, I play Amatic slots for the same reason as you but can't endure them spinning for more than half an hour.

That's where the misleading terms is used. Because 5. the real balance and welcome bonus will be added to your balance 6. should say Your total balance is subject to a 40x WR Funds in their mind means 40x d+b indeed but even AG misinterpreted that one so it's a Mickey Mouse intended written T&C's, a fluke and a hoax all in one. But I just finished at Bullsbet: I have one new screenshot for you that could blow your mind. Watch still to do WR carefully...one is from yesterday with a €250 balance left, second one is taken with € 0.54 left. long story short: €250 is considered as €71.26 wagering. That's all winnings excluded going down I again had to write a review: dislike.txt is includeddislikesBullsbetIO.txt

That's the mentality! Good for you bro', hope this gets settled in a decent manner...Casinos nowadays, Djeez Louise, what farces!