TheAverageGuy

In theory if it was already approved and the payout processed, then one should not affect the other. Being a weekend payout, it would depend on the casino and how on the ball they are about processing payments. Time will tell in the end ?

I am so sorry for making everyone wait but I haven't been home for the much part of today. But anyway...
This weeks winner is ......... Theaverageguy
@TheAverageGuy Please send me a PM with your email and username at the casino
Details of the draw can be found here - https://app.randompicker.com/protocol/610550x51910
 

Congrats AG!...not AskGamblers...AverageGuy...no wonder he beat me to it this time! Hehehe.

Oh... Hehe didn’t even think of his AG initials before ?

Congrats TheAverageGuy  ?

Glad to see you decided to post after! Good luck in finding your writers. 

Hi!

We are looking for people who are super enthusiastic when it comes to casino (or sportsbook) topics. Always aiming to create content that you would love to read yourself!
Do you have what it takes to turn your passion into a written piece? Don't miss your chance!

Leave a comment so I can mssg you.

Thanks & happy spinning!

Psssst... Did I mention that we pay well? No? Well, now you know.

@Afi4wins @TheAverageGuy @pinnit2015 - I think you guys would be suitable for this.
@FreakyApe - You can message me more info...

I'm in!

Just my thoughts...members would be more willing to do this suggestion bit if there's some sort of a reward in return...like maybe collect so many points (from each suggestion made) and earn $5...then it becomes a bit like writing reviews but on a much simpler and smaller scale...and keep all AG reviews up to date too. 
Any members out there who would be willing to make these correction changes for nothing? Hmmm...do you see any hands up Sharon? ?

So guys, AG have just launched another exciting feature which means you can now suggest improvements bonus, casino and slot reviews. If you see an inaccuracy you can click the 'Suggest an  Edit'  tab to tell us what needs to be improvement.
The team will then view your edit and if it is found to be the correcr infomation compared to what AG  has it will be edited. Cool, right?
Yu can read more about how it works - HERE

1-3 days to complete n interac e-transfer?
seems to me like Gigadat needs some competition.
In 3hrs the casino could process the payout to me by bitcoin and I could have it e-transfered off to the winner.. and that’s just as a player.. surely a payment processor should be able to match ?

woot! thanks ?

@TheAverageGuy You're IN!! If you win or any Canadian members win the 100 free spins can be claimed on BGaming's West Town Slot.

In?

Direx needs to step up its game and turn netent on forbus canuks, they’re losing precious deposits as we spin away on netent elsewhere ?

I see how it is, the fix is in ;-0)
 
As I gear it, NetEnt is popping up for Canadians, arrived in videoslots and leovegas today.
 
Perhaps it won't be a concern for much longer.

This is going to be drawn sometime this afternoon guys ... Good luck everyone.

Still waiting on the reply to this one but I will let you know ASAP

@TheAverageGuy - Waiting on a response regarding your question. I'll let you know as soon as I know.

Okay, I'll query this on Monday for you as they're celebrating their Easter holidays at the moment.

Was reading quite carefully this particular forum topic and kinda surprised no one has suggested  a possible solution yet. ? 
IMHO, nothing of the aforementioned would ever change unless gaming operators implement and start announcing two instead of a single RTP stat. One is obvious and which we all know as TRTP /Theoretical Return To Player/ aaaand which is responsible for all these annoying, pompous and quite often, truly ridiculous advertisements of possible winning potential.  The other one should be called "Current RTP" and represent the RTP stats achieved in the relevant operator at the current moment. 
Sounds shocking and almost revolutionary, I know, but no better way to guarantee your players the  level of transparency ad fairness we all dream about.  Most viper Mcrogaming casinos have done it before with all these eCOGRA monthly audits and although just a start it was definitely a step in the right direction. Later, BetAt and a few other operators introduced the so called Hot&Cold feature with displaying RTP stats for the relevant games in real time which certainly proves it is possible. 
Now all we need is a gentle push on behalf a serious regulatory body and what do you know, this might change the whole industry.  Just imagine the potential... it's gigantic and totally capable to change the way in which casinos operate, advertise, build their websites, literally everything.
...........Gees! Seems like I fell asleep and started dreaming after getting up so early for GOT S08e02... ? 

The trouble for me with these massive "potential maximum win(s)" as I see it versus the older ones with much easier to understand paytables is the piece of the RTP that the top 5-10% of potential wins account for (never prominently displayed.. or available to see... or discussed....)  require more and more of it being removed from the potential wins n the remaining 90-95% of payouts... spins... deposit longevity... growing more and more predatory with every additional increase in the "LIFE ALTERING, MIND BOGGLING, PROBLEM SOLVING, SCREENSHOT ENVY CREATING MAXIMUM POSSIBLE WIN*"
 
*the opinions expressed in the previous promotion of the maximum potential win of aforementioned gaming products  is not intended to induce, encourage or make any guarantees of individual experiences while using these products for recreation and entertainment purposes at all. The advertised maximum potential win can potentially occur on any  spin at any time**
 
**When means tested using industry standard mathematical models that require sample sizes of tens of millions to billions of spins to ensure advertised RTP is statistically accurate to within  a 0.0??? percent margin of error.... theoretically...
 
 

The trouble for me with these massive "potential maximum win(s)" as I see it versus the older ones with much easier to understand paytables is the piece of the RTP that the top 5-10% of potential wins account for (never prominently displayed.. or available to see... or discussed....)  require more and more of it being removed from the potential wins n the remaining 90-95% of payouts... spins... deposit longevity... growing more and more predatory with every additional increase in the "LIFE ALTERING, MIND BOGGLING, PROBLEM SOLVING, SCREENSHOT ENVY CREATING MAXIMUM POSSIBLE WIN*"
 
*the opinions expressed in the previous promotion of the maximum potential win of aforementioned gaming products  is not intended to induce, encourage or make any guarantees of individual experiences while using these products for recreation and entertainment purposes at all. The advertised maximum potential win can potentially occur on any  spin at any time**
 
**When means tested using industry standard mathematical models that require sample sizes of tens of millions to billions of spins to ensure advertised RTP is statistically accurate to within  a 0.0??? percent margin of error.... theoretically...
 
 

They will have hit that value in the twenty billion spins they did in the testing phase; it’s part of the lab testing specs for game certification I believe where they detail all the permutations. 
Whilst I don’t think places that promote this are lying, they are leaving out valuable context of over how many spins it took to hit. Not how many times it happened but, strictly speaking, it’s true. 
One view is that they should state the odds of this (one in a trillion if a trillion spins). Other people many not like the idea of assigning probability type lottery odds to a slot.
Id be very surprised if they didn’t have the evidence of the 60k hit : it’s so obvious on the slot machine, that it would be pretty easy for the ASA etc to ask ‘show us’. 
I don’t see it as any different to claims of a 96.8% RTP in the help file; have to place reliance on the independence of the testing labs. Whether that’s enough for some people is their choice. 
I can see the problems with such spurious claims and I wouldn’t be surprise if something was introduced in the future to at least caveat it. 
My bigger issue is that, given most games have win caps, whilst I may hit 60kcal on 20p and get it all, should it happen on a fiver: I won’t