Member Request: Is this rule Unfair?

[cocopop3011]

Hi Guys,

I have a new member from India having some issues figuring out how to create a post so I have offered to help. But please let's all welcome @CHANUMOLU5952 to the forum. 

His issue is to do with roulette as follows (I know some of you don't play but @Blackjax thought you may be able to offer some assistance too)

Member Question:  (Rule listed below)

I  feel bet over 25 numbers or more out of 37 is not permitted by casino. Please I need askgamblers expert opinion on this rule.

I feel it's not a fair rule.. Just I want to know why the casino maintain this rule...

Reason behind this rule..

If expert's feel it's a fair rule just in which factors are considered for fair

Quote

6.12 Certain bets are considered risk-free / low-risk and are therefore excluded. Examples of risk-free / low-risk betting are: * Low risk roulette play when the player places equal bets on both black and red or even and odd covering 25 or more out of 37 numbers on the table. (Placing bets on both black and red covers 36 of 37 possible numbers) * Team play with other players. Any attempt to manipulate / abuse the games and / or the promotion will result in the loss of any prize and the player will be disqualified for the campaign. Included, but not limited to, risk-free betting with guaranteed winnings, regardless of the outcome. If the system recognizes them as valid, we reserve the right to cancel any winnings released in this way, as well as any potential losses for the organizer. We reserve the right in case of unscrupulous actions by a player or group of players in order to illegally take advantage, to deduct any positive balance from the gaming account of the participating customer, which is received as a result of illegal actions, and the amount of possible losses suffered.

 

[Afi4wins]

I'm not a roulette player, but here's my opinion anyway...rightly or wrongly.

25 numbers out of 37 gives a 67.56% coverage, leaving 32.44% margin for the provider. Theoretical of course, because the actual win or loss (Return To Player) would vary depending on the positioning of the bets.

Is it fair or not? I wouldn't know for sure, but in the 1980s and early 1990s, all games were allocated with a simple win/loss formula...60%/40%...but as games became more sophisticated, that formula no longer became suitable, so a sophisticated formula based on Theoretical Return To Player was used instead.

If you think that 67.56% is unfair, then don't play that game...find a better provider's roulette system. Not all roulettes have the same rule!

Just my thoughts there. 

[Blackjax]

I am aware of this rule during bonus wager and for casinos that give cashback but I dont know if they stop you from doing this in real money play. if a person covers a lot of numbers being under bonus money  it helps to wager quick without any risk which is unfair towards casino. Some casinos give cashback on wagers on live casino. For eg if you wager 10000 even on a deposit of $100 you would get 5 to 10% cashback so that is $500-$1000 cashback on a deposit of $100. If a person would keep on covering a lot of numbers  they would make money on cash back on small deposits. Real money restrictions I dont know. As far as I know you only get 10 to 15 seconds to place bets and the bets in last 2-3 seconds on live roulette are not even accepted, so how can he even cover those many spots!

[CHANUMOLU5952]

Hi,

Actually I am deposited 30k and I get 26k as a bonus.

I am starting play with those 56k  with different strategies for here only 10$ on bet  consider for fullfill the wegering.

I am playing with 65% :35%(profit:loss) strategy..

After playing a lot of game rounds arround 2days by average I won 1200k but casino team was cancelled all my winnings due break those rule...

My question is for placing more number coverd bet I didn't get any statistical benfit like no additional benefit for wagering if I placed 100$ bet there consider on 10$ for wagering..

I think it's not a fair rule...

The game provider was evolution gameing Ltd they allows it but only this casino was not permitted...

[Blackjax]

 If you take a bonus you need to follow the rules otherwise you should not accept a deposit bonus and play with real funds and do whatever you want. Secondly by placing those bets you obviously had an advantage as the more numbers you covered the bigger chance you had to win. 

BTW which casino were you playing on and were you playing lightning roulette? A game where lightning strikes on a number and gives a multiplier.