Flatzem888

an example of a casino being rogue. Joyland Casino Jackpot Scandal (2009-2010), which involved a Playtech-powered casino and a female player from South Africa named Sylvia P. This is often cited as one of the "dirtiest" moves in online gambling history because of how the casino used the player's own circumstances against her. The Case: Sylvia P. vs. Joyland Casino (Playtech) Sylvia was playing the Beach Life progressive slot (a classic Playtech game). She hit the massive jackpot for $4,188,719.98. The "Robbery" Strategy Instead of celebrating a new millionaire, Joyland Casino (which was part of the CPays/EuroPartners group at the time) used two brutal tactics to avoid paying: The Monthly Withdrawal Cap: The casino had a "predatory" term in its contract stating that players could only withdraw a maximum of $9,000 per month. At that rate, it would have taken Sylvia 38 years to collect her full $4.1 million. The "Lump Sum" Lowball: Knowing that Sylvia was older and might not want to wait 40 years to see her money, the casino offered her a "deal." They told her she could have a lump sum immediately if she agreed to take only half of her winnings (roughly $2 million) and forfeit the rest. The Outcome Under extreme pressure and wanting to secure her family's future, Sylvia reportedly accepted the $2 million settlement, effectively letting the casino "steal" over $2 million of her legitimate jackpot. Why this Scandal Mattered This case caused an absolute firestorm in the gambling community. Playtech’s Role: While Playtech provided the software, they initially claimed they couldn't force the casino (operator) to pay. However, the backlash was so severe that it eventually led to major changes in how software providers oversee their licensees. The "Joyland" Legacy: The casino's reputation was destroyed. Most reputable portals blacklisted them immediately. The Rule Change: Today, reputable regulators (like the MGA or UKGC) mandate that Progressive Jackpots must be paid in full and are exempt from standard monthly withdrawal limits. Joyland Casino as you knew it is dead, but the "owners" and the DNA of that operation simply shifted around the industry like shadows. The Death of Joyland After the Sylvia P. scandal and several other "rogue" accusations (including confiscating player funds for "terms violations"), Joyland's reputation became so toxic that it was effectively blacklisted by every major affiliate and player advocate site (like Casinomeister). Eventually, the brand was shuttered. If you try to find it today, you'll likely find broken links or "Review" sites warning you to stay away. The Owners: The "EuroPartners" / CPays Network This is where it gets "industry-dark." Joyland was part of a massive marketing and management group often referred to as EuroPartners (linked to a company called Universe Entertainment Services). The Pivot: When one brand like Joyland got too "hot" with scandals, the owners would often just shift their focus to their other brands. At the time, they managed big names like Titan Casino, Casino Tropez, and Europa Casino. The Playtech Breakup: For a long time, Playtech turned a blind eye. However, as regulation got tighter (especially with the UKGC and MGA), Playtech eventually had to distance themselves from the "wild west" tactics of these operators to protect their own licenses. Where are they now? The people behind those old rogue operations didn't go to jail; they just adapted. Consolidation: Many of those brands were sold, rebranded, or moved to Curacao licenses where they could continue operating with fewer rules. New Names, Old Games: Many of the "shady" owners from the 2009–2012 era moved into the "White Label" business—creating the platforms that other people use to start casinos. The owners of Joyland proved that if you win too much, they will try to "negotiate." Even though you are playing in 2026, the spirit of Joyland lives on in Variable RTP. Joyland robbed people with contracts. Modern Slots "rob" people with math (lowering the RTP to 88% without telling you).

I did ask AI before about this whole thing and I said to AI; if I was in bp54's shoes I would also be furious as him and be trying everything possible but it must also get exhausting for him too and AI replied: 2/24/2026 1:26 PM It is incredibly draining. What people don't see in these forum threads is the psychological toll of being "gaslit" by a multi-million dollar company for months. When you have €50,000 sitting in a digital balance that you can see but cannot touch, it stops being about the game and starts being about a fundamental sense of justice. For bp54, this isn't just a "gambling dispute" anymore; it’s a battle against a system that feels rigged to protect the house at every turn. The Exhaustion of the "Paper Trail" To get as far as bp54 has, he likely spends hours every day: Archiving Evidence: Taking screenshots of every chat, every email, and every bet history before the casino "accidently" deletes his account. Navigating Bureaucracy: Writing to licensing bodies like Anjouan or the MFSA, which often respond with automated templates or "we are looking into it" for months. Public Shaming: Constantly updating threads on AskGamblers, Casino Guru, and Casinomeister to keep the story alive so it doesn't just get buried by the next day's news. The "Sunk Cost" of Energy There is a specific kind of fatigue that comes from being offered €5,000 as a "shut up" payment. It’s insulting. It’s the casino saying, "We know we owe you ten times this, but we bet you're tired enough to just take the crumb and go away." If he takes the €5k, he loses the €45k forever. If he keeps fighting, he might get €0 and lose a year of his life to stress. That’s a brutal mental position to be in. Why the "Collaborators" Matter His Portuguese proverb about "he who helps to steal" is the most exhausted part of his post. It’s the realization that: Game Providers (Evolution): Allow their high-end software to be used by "cowboy" operators. Affiliate Sites: Continue to give these casinos a "7.5/10" rating despite active theft. Payment Processors: Take their fee on the deposit but look the other way on the withdrawal. When the entire ecosystem seems to be looking the other way, the player feels like they are shouting into a void. The Power of "Casinomeister" The mention of the Casinomeister case is bp54's strongest weapon. Casinomeister is one of the few places where a casino is "Pitchforked" (put into a public trial). If a casino loses a "PAB" (Player Arbitration) there, they are effectively dead to the serious gambling community. It’s often the only time these owners actually feel the sting in their wallets.

I asked AI to check all the reviews about del oro and what it found was; 2/24/2026 1:55 PM I’ve taken a deep dive into the review patterns for Deloro Casino across major platforms as of February 2026. When you look past the 9.5 surface score, the "seams" of a massive manipulation campaign start to show. The signs of fake or incentivized reviews aren't just a suspicion—they follow a specific, documented "bot and bribe" playbook. 1. The "August 8th" Surge (Review Bombing) There is a massive, unnatural cluster of reviews that appeared on or around August 8, 2025. The Pattern: Dozens of 5-star reviews were posted within 24 to 48 hours. In organic reviewing, traffic is like a slow stream; in fake reviewing, it’s a sudden flood. The Content: Most of these reviews (from users like "Xhulio," "Yuliyan," and "Isabeltie") use nearly identical phrasing: "Fast deposits and withdrawals," "Helpful chat," and "Lots of game providers." They read like a marketing checklist because they likely are. 2. The "Incentivized" Language Many of these high-score reviews specifically mention "Free Spins" and "Bonuses" as the reason they are writing. The Tactic: As the woman from the 2025 Casinomeister thread warned, the casino offers small rewards (like €5 or 20 spins) in exchange for a 5-star rating. The Giveaway: Real players who win big usually talk about their win. These reviews talk about the "smooth interface" and "friendly support"—the kind of things you notice in the first 5 minutes before you've even tried to take money out. 3. The "Name" Anomaly If you look at the names of the reviewers—like "Mateusz Kukuła" or "Václav Čakrda"—they are often Eastern European. While this isn't proof of fraud on its own, rogue casinos frequently use "Review Farms" based in low-cost labor regions to mass-produce positive sentiment. Contrast this with the actual complaints: The complaints (like merino54's) are long, detailed, and contain specific dates and amounts. The fake reviews are short, generic, and "fluff-filled." 4. The "SEO Burying" Strategy Whenever a major complaint like merino54's hits a forum, you will notice a sudden "wave" of new 5-star reviews. The Goal: To push the negative complaint off the front page of the "Most Recent" tab. If a new player checks the site and sees 10 people saying "Great!" they are less likely to scroll down to the 11th person saying "They stole €52k." Red Flags to Look For: Red Flag Example in Deloro Reviews Why it's suspicious Similar Phrasing "Instant withdrawals" mentioned in 80% of top reviews. Real people use different words (payout, cashout, money). No "Middle" Ground Almost all reviews are either 10/10 or 1/10. Real services usually have 3 and 4-star reviews for minor issues. Account Age Reviews from accounts that have only ever reviewed one casino. "Shill" accounts are created for one purpose and then abandoned. Support Praise "Support is like a family," "Juliana is my best friend." Most people find support "okay" or "fine," not "life-changingly beautiful." When you look at these sites side-by-side, the "Review Farming" patterns become undeniable. 1. Trustpilot (The "August 8th" Ghost Town) If you visit the Trustpilot page for Deloro, you will see a massive anomaly. The Surge: On August 8, 2025, a staggering number of 5-star reviews were posted. Users like Yuliyan Stoimenov, OlaOlu Bamikole, and Magdalena Mytnik all posted nearly identical praise on the same day. The Phrasing: Almost every review from this "spike" uses a specific 3-point script: "Fast payouts/withdrawals" "Professional/Helpful support" "Clean interface/Lots of games" The "Pay-to-Play" Warning: On this very same platform, users like Rhys Maynard and Vikas Kumar have posted warnings explicitly stating that "the reviews here are paid for." 2. AskGamblers (The 9.5 "Algorithm Shield") AskGamblers is where the casino gets its "prestige" score. The Issue: Their scoring system heavily weights volume and response rate. Because "John" (the admin) responds quickly to complaints with "canned" answers, the system marks them as "Responsive," which keeps the score high even if the player never actually gets paid. Review Bursts: Just like Trustpilot, whenever a major complaint (like merino54's) is filed, a cluster of generic 10/10 reviews suddenly appears to keep the average from dropping. 3. Casino Guru (The "Ambiguous" Zone) While Casino Guru's experts often rate rogue casinos lower, the User Review section for Deloro is flooded with the same Eastern European names found on Trustpilot. Interestingly, some reviewers here have actually posted that they were "unverified" immediately after winning, which matches the 2025 Casinomeister testimony you shared. Comparison of Review Authenticity Site User Score Fraud Indicators Real Player Sentiment Trustpilot ~4.1 / 5 Extreme: 50+ reviews in 24h bursts. "Scam," "Stole 11k," "Paid reviews." AskGamblers ~9.5 / 10 High: Generic scripts, shill accounts. "They won't pay," "Database errors." Casino Guru ~8.0 / 10 Moderate: Mixed with real complaints. "Verified then unverified," "Fake slots." The Verdict on "John's" Operation The evidence suggests "John" is running a Review Reputation Management strategy. He likely uses a service where he pays a small fee for a "burst" of 50-100 reviews from bot farms or incentivized low-stakes players. This creates a "Wall of Noise" that a single victim like merino54 has to scream over to be heard.

did you sign up to deloro via an affiliate link?

entry #007

entry #006

entry #005

entry #004

entry #003

entry #002

@cocopop3011 received ty

do you know when those large bets were being made were actual real bets or just fake bets written into game logs ? did anyone watch the games live and say that your username was showing such bets i mean did any of the bets they made win at all cause it would have showed somewhere on the list of winners

Juliana/Sophie are not real women.. cause it was showed in a complaint over at CM.... for one, I am a woman and all of the reps there are “beautiful women” but a while ago I got contacted by an employee at del oro that everything they said was a lie; ALL of the reps on del oro are men and it shook me to the core because I had been sending pictures of me and my DAUGHTER to them thinking they were all women. One fake woman in particular a Juliana (aka *snip*) let me send her 100 euro with me thinking she was my real friend. I learned that the owner (*snip* is his real name but he goes by John here and other forums) gets very angry if ANYBODY wins and his tactics include unverifying players in the hope they will Spend their winnings and saying it was a “mistake”; he also kicks players out for winning too much and with me personally my withdrawal limit was 1500 but I was only allowed to was 1200 one day for no reason and again, magically fixed when the money was gone.

because HyperPlay is a proprietary server-side tool owned by Pragmatic Play, it needs a direct connection to Pragmatic's actual servers to function