Valge

Interesting topic, thanks for sharing the Cft letter. I don’t think the investigation alone destroys Curaçao’s credibility – if anything, outside scrutiny can be a good thing. The real test will be what CGA does next. If this ends with no visible changes to oversight or complaints handling, it will just confirm the old reputation and push more operators and players toward other jurisdictions. But if they use the pressure to tighten checks and become more transparent, Curaçao 2.0 could still recover some trust. Right now it feels like a turning point rather than a verdict. Curious to see which way they go.

Hi and welcome! Good question. In most Anjouan setups, it works like this: The licence is issued to one company -->That company then runs many brands/domains under the same licence. So it’s usually one operator with lots of skins, not a Curacao-style “master licence renting to many separate companies”. If you open the T&Cs on those sites, you’ll normally see the same legal entity repeated in the footer – that’s the real operator behind all the brands. If you want to dig deeper into how these structures work, feel free to DM me.

Hey all. New around here and looking forward to exploring the forum, reading stories and maybe sharing some of my own later on.