Jump to content
icon Ag awards
icon
Notifications
Login
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Recommended Posts

Posted
7 hours ago, Boss022 said:

I request an official representative of Pinco Casino to join this discussion and address my case directly.

Hi and welcome to the forum - I’m not sure we have an active rep for Pinco - can we try to help you? 

Posted

Hello,

Thank you for your response.

Yes, I would appreciate your assistance.

My case is straightforward but has not been properly addressed so far. I played for approximately 5 hours, and my winnings were later confiscated by Pinco Casino with the claim of a “technical malfunction.”

However, I have evidence indicating that:

- The gameplay was stable and consistent over a long session

- No visible malfunction affected my experience

- A system message later appeared restricting access (“real game prohibited”), which raises serious concerns about system-side issues

Despite this, my winnings were removed without a clear, evidence-based explanation.

I would like your help in reviewing this situation objectively and advising whether this appears fair from an independent perspective.

I can provide all supporting evidence if needed.

Thank you.

Posted

@Boss022 Did you take a deposit bonus when you played at Pinco?

Also, is your country on its restricted list and did you use a VPN to bypass the restriction?

If your answer is "no" for both questions, the the game and provider may be restricted for your country.

A technical malfunction may refer to the casino's system for not restricting your play when it should have.

Posted

My account was registered using my country’s official ID, I completed face verification (KYC), and I made deposits using bank cards issued in my country.

If my country or the game provider were restricted, how was I able to pass verification and use my local payment methods without any issue?

Doesn’t this seem inconsistent?

Posted
2 hours ago, Boss022 said:

My account was registered using my country’s official ID, I completed face verification (KYC), and I made deposits using bank cards issued in my country.

If my country or the game provider were restricted, how was I able to pass verification and use my local payment methods without any issue?

Doesn’t this seem inconsistent?

@Boss022 Provider restriction is not the same as casino restriction - there are a number of casinos that do not restrict certain countries (KYC allowed) but such players are restricted by certain providers, so they cannot play these restricted games.

Posted

I would like to respond to your explanation by referring directly to Pinco’s official rules and policies.

According to your KYC and verification requirements, you clearly state that:

- Players must provide identity documents (passport/ID), proof of address, and verification photos

- Documents are reviewed to confirm the player’s identity and ownership of the account

- The casino has the right to request additional documents if needed

I have fully complied with these requirements. My identity, location, and payment methods were verified and accepted by your system.

This means my account was considered valid, authorized, and eligible for full use of the platform.

Therefore, I have the following question:

If my account passed full verification and was approved by your system, on what basis were my winnings later voided?

Furthermore, according to your own rules:

- All player data and game activity are stored and managed within your system

- Game providers operate independently and only receive minimal data

This means:

- My gameplay sessions were recorded

- My game rounds were processed

- My winnings were calculated and displayed in real time

If there was a provider restriction, I should not have been able to access or play those games at all.

However, I was allowed to:

- Access the games

- Play multiple rounds

- Complete sessions

- Generate winnings

Only after that, the winnings were voided.

This is inconsistent with your own stated policies and raises serious concerns about fairness and transparency.

If necessary, I am ready to provide full evidence, including screenshots of gameplay sessions and transaction history.

I request a clear and evidence-based explanation for this decision.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
  • Create New...