Are Curacao the Underdogs?

[cocopop3011]

Rewind......

Rewind to 8 years ago-ish and everyone always used to warn me about playing at casinos with a Curacao license. I never really understood what all the fuss was about because, to the best of my knowledge I've never experienced any issues with their licencees. 

Which begs the question, are Curacao the underdogs? Have they been overlooked with the likes of MGA and UKGC all these years? Or am I hitting the ball in the wrong net here  

[Afi4wins]

One ticket costs $50, with consumer protection and insurance included. The other ticket costs $15, but has no consumer protection at all. I would definitely buy that $15 ticket as it is so much cheaper!

Curacao license allows casino owners to provide cheaper casinos to play at, with very little or no protection for the players, but if nothing goes wrong, then that player gets to enjoy the game just as much as the other player would at the more expensive licensed casino.

Is Curacao the underdog? Not the way I see it. It provides a much cheaper solution, although a more riskier one, so Curacao license is actually an alternative solution.

Careless and ignorant players (most players are) are advised to play at the latter casinos, cos if anything goes wrong, which most probably would, then they have a reliable source to get assistance. With Curacao licensed casinos, they'd most probably only get deaf ears, but that's the difference they have to accept in the first place.

Having said that, Curacao licensed casinos DO NOT mean rogue or unreliable casinos! Some are just as good, if not better, as the MGA/UKGC licensed ones.

I always avoid MGA licensed casinos (restricted from UKGC ones), simply because they tend to cause me more headaches than pleasure!