casinoian87
-
Posts
150 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
casinoian87's Achievements
Solid Gambler (3/8)
8
Reputation
-
Hoisserog reacted to a post in a topic:
SUSPENDED: We are paying $5 for every published comment!
-
Noitadvontedo reacted to a post in a topic:
SUSPENDED: We are paying $5 for every published comment!
-
PlewVesYLelve reacted to a post in a topic:
A Betonsoft Casino with THE best Customer Service I've Dealt with at a casino
-
for his addiction to prostitutes.....
-
and pete was upset because the woman left and he knew he was going to get some that night, so....
-
Obviously the refrence about the raffle wasn't monetary, replace baught with given x amount of raffle tickets if that makes it easier to understand, but I just wanna understand this correctly as long you just write 1 post for the story during the month, your odds are the same as if you posted 10 times right? I just want clarification so I don't have to post anything unneccasary....
-
2nd drawing held by AskGamblers Completed on Friday, 1 June 2012 at 19:56:46 UTC 7 entrants, 1 winner I prove my point , only 7 entrants, I beleive there was well over 7 posts. This is not how the rules for this where layed out and the results lack integrity, there should be as many entrants as there are posts, the last two or more drawings have been done in a way that doesn't reward the people who contribute the most and violate the whole purpose and rules of this contest initially layed out in the very first post. There should be a re-draw and it should be done correctly, you can even take my name out so I can show you that Im not pointing out this error for my own personal gain, but so that it can be resolved. In one out of the 50 states there was a discrepancy in the amount of votes in the State of Florida, for the presidential election, the outcome of that was 8 years of the worst president this country has ever had, the only one who may have been worse was his father. So I am indeed glad you anticpated my post, and listed the way you did it, and now I am interested in how you respond to my post, and try to tell me that what I wrote is incorrect. I think that a site that holds it's integrity above all, which was your reasoning for deleting about 20 of my reviews, would have no problem doing a re-draw, that is done properly, in order to maintain that level of integrity...... Wouldn't you agree??
-
Yes and the way its set up, it doesn't matter if you posted once or one hundred times, where on the original post it says "When we think the story has run its course, we'll wrap it up. Then all people who contributed to the story will be put into our randomizer, and it will determine who the winner of $50 is. The more you contribute to the story, the more entries you will get, and the better chance you have of being a winner." So the correct way to do it would have been to take the amount of posts on the story for the month for each person, and each for each post you have your name entered, for example if you posted 3x on the story that month your name is thrown in the randomizer 3 times if you posted once you would only have your name entered once. The way you did the drawing was put each person who posted even if it was just once or more, only one entry into the randomizer thus going against what the initial rules stated, and defeating the purpose of posting on the story. It's like a raffle if you buy 100 tickets and the guy next to you bought 1 ticket, the guy who bought 100 tickets has 100 chances of winning the raffle where as the guy who baught one has 1 chance. If thats the case, the way you have done the last 2 drawings, there was no point in writing more than 1 post in the entire month, because it didn't increase your chances of winning, it just wasted your time. Does that make sense?
-
How do you do the randomizer? Do you have an entry per post each person makes, or does it make no difference if you post once or 100 times in that month? because according to the rules on the first page the more posts you have the more likely you are to win, yet the person with the least amount during the month does? Im confused as to what the rules actually are?
-
4th grade.....
-
Is anyone going to continue this? New Topic: There was a man who wished he was 10 years old again because he felt that life was......
-
http://www.askgamblers.com/casino/slots-jungle-casino-review-r4183#leave-comment Slots Jungle Casino review, Last for the night...
-
Palace of Chance http://www.askgamblers.com/casino/palace-of-chance-review-r90#leave-comment Cirrus UK** http://www.askgamblers.com/casino/cirrus-casino-review-r79#leave-comment
-
Thanks I appreciate it, I won't get 10 in, maybe 7-8 at most here is a 7spins review http://www.askgamblers.com/casino/7spins-review-r4256#leave-comment , Thats 5, I will write 3 more, 2 more negative RTGS Palace of Chance and Cirrus UK (it is a seperate casino, and there is a lot of UK players on here) and end on a positive one.
-
http://www.askgamblers.com/casino/wild-vegas-casino-review-r734#leave-comment Wild Vegas Review
-
http://www.askgamblers.com/casino/cirrus-casino-review-r79#leave-comment Cirrus Casino
-
http://www.askgamblers.com/casino/cool-cat-casino-review-r114#leave-comment cool cat review, 2 down, at least 8 more to go.
-
No chance, she went from her paw looking injured, to her legs not being able to work in a few days, and its not lime, heart worm or any common disease, its probably a brain tumor.... were putting her asleep 2morrow, so tonight I will focus on pointing out all the negative casinos I have yet to review. The first is Slots of Vegas http://www.askgamblers.com/casino/slots-of-vegas-review-r2495#leave-comment