Jump to content
icon Ag awards
icon
Notifications
Login

Tristincov

Members
  • Posts

    2
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Tristincov's Achievements

Newbie Gambler

Newbie Gambler (1/8)

0

Reputation

  1. All four platforms require Date of Birth + 4-digit PIN for account recovery and to initiate support chat. Implication: This is an uncommon verification combination and strengthens the case for shared operational design. --- 3. Shared Gaming Providers Provider Present on RTG (Realtime Gaming) Ignition, Bovada.lv, Slots.lv Rival Gaming Ignition, Bovada.lv, Slots.lv BetSoft Ignition, Bovada.lv, Slots.lv Genesis Gaming Ignition & possibly Slots.lv Proprietary / in-house titles All three brands Implication: Overlap in providers suggests shared backend or licensing agreements. Independent casinos rarely have identical provider sets across all major games. --- 4. Sequential Company Numbers CafeCasino.lv → Company #11547 Ignition Casino → Company #11548 Probability that unrelated companies would be assigned sequential numbers: ~0.01–0.05% Implication: Strong indicator of common corporate control or filings done simultaneously by the same entity. --- 5. Combined Likelihood Assessment We can combine these independent probabilities to approximate the overall chance of all these coincidences happening independently: Factor Probability if independent Shared “service@” email 0.14% Sequential company numbers ~0.03% (average) Shared game providers (rough estimate) Let’s conservatively estimate 5% Shared DOB+PIN verification flow ~10% (somewhat uncommon) > Combined “all independent” probability (rough estimate): P_{\text{combined}} \approx 0.0014 \times 0.0003 \times 0.05 \times 0.10 \approx 2.1 \times 10^{-9} Converted to percentage: 0.00000021% Interpretation: Essentially zero chance these patterns arose independently. --- 6. Conclusion The combined evidence — shared support email, verification flow, gaming providers, and sequential company numbers — strongly supports that: Ignition Casino, Slots.lv, Bovada.lv, and CafeCasino.lv are highly likely connected. Likely share back-end infrastructure, parent company, or operational management. This conclusion is far more probable than the alternative (that these similarities arose by coincidence). They continue to deny that they are associated look at the images I submitted. Clearly they are connected.
  2. Ignition casino is a fraudulent site that is going to be taken down very soon by the DOJ. They commit fraud every time they process a payment on debit and credit cards because they use the wrong mcc showing up as electronic store when the mcc 5997 I believe is the one they are legally required to use which is gaming. The penalties range from 100k-1m USD per instance and up to 2m Euros for each violation is EU. They offer games to residents in EU despite not having a gaming license to operate there. There gaming license is fake, just like the one on bovada.lv, slots.lv, cafecasino.lv. you couldn't submit a complaint if you tried. The real gaming licenses issued by Curacao comes from Curacaogaming.com the one that ignition casino has says Curacaooffshorefinancialauthority.org which is a fraudulent site. They claim to be independently run but the chances of that is literally 0.000002% I will upload my analysis following this post. They refused to admit that they are all connected. They refused to give me there gaming license number which no legitimately run casino can do. They do not have a certified seal of RNG which means there is no guarantee that they haven't manipulated games. I highly advise all of you NOT to play at any of these "casinos".
×
  • Create New...