felixburk94

At some degree you have accepted their ruling when you regard their evidence as adequate and the matter as "solved". I have quoted three recent threads below where none of the players seem to have opened multiple accounts themselves. Ip addresses are mostly dynamic and there is a very high probability that your current ip has been used by a player before. I am fed up with these kind of horrible rulings and it seems the casinos can do pretty much what they feel like regarding payment issues. If the casino rules would prohibit the use of the same internet browser as another user, do you consider it a legitimate claim for confiscation of winnings?
 
https://www.askgamblers.com/casino-complaints/n1-casino-bonus-winnings-removed-due-to-duplicate-accounts
 
https://www.askgamblers.com/casino-complaints/n1-casino-unfairly-accused-of-having-multiple-accounts
 
https://www.askgamblers.com/casino-complaints/n1-casino-refuse-to-pay-4000eur

I've witnessed many threads recently regarding N1 Casino and their bonus rules claiming they don't allow two accounts using the same ip address. However, as anyone with any knowledge whatsoever about ip configuration would know, ip addresses are reused in a timely fashion within the bounds of dynamic ip setup. Some internet providers more commonly reuse ip addresses than others but since your current ip most likely have been in use multiple times before you use it, the bonus terms in N1 Casino are very likely to put users in breach of the terms. As I can see it in the threads I've analyzed, N1 Casino and hence the Askgamblers mods, are allowing this juridically weak argument for closing down winning accounts in a subjective and horrible matter. It would be great if the players at least could KNOW how to follow the rules, either by showing more specific evidence in such threads or not allowing accounts be played at or created by the same ip address.
 
I've never heard of any losses returned to the player due to multiple accounts and I guess we'll never see any...

Common term across 99% of casinos. Personally, they should be following it up by linking the 'other' person to the same address and/or seeing if the 'other' person actually exists (electoral register checks and/or many of the other data points).
 
Personally, if i logged into a hotels wifi....registered...won and got it refused because there were another 300 users with the same IP address I'd not be a happy bunny. That's not protecting against abusers, that's just taking someone's winnings. Just my view and i'm sure Valdes may disagree...
 
Happened at Betat...asked me there was a user with same IP. I said yes, Mrs Pinnit. Is it ok? They confirmed she existed and all was fine. So we have 2 accounts at the address. 
 
We have many a 2 accounts at our address - all approved, presumably because they know we are 2 separate people. Well, the good casinos anyway.