MrJTA

Hi Guy's just being catching up on the thread.
 
Sorry I've been so quiet. Had other work commitments leaving little time to follow this matter up. I see Supernuk you have had confirmation that Smart TV UK Limited have had a further extension on the suspension of their active proposal of a voluntary strike off!
 
Tho realistically the companies we should be concerned about and I stressed this in the review section having sent supporting evidence to companies house are Smart Gaming Limited and Smart TV Broadcasting Limited. We need to prevent these companies from voluntarily striking off the register if they attempt in the near future. Latest account show that Smart TV Broadcasting Limited hold the most value. After further investigation each financial year till date the have been paying off an assumed debt on average of 1 mill. This we can assume is bollox and all this money is being laundered out the business by falsifying accounts with the two associated companies Smart TV UK Limted and Smart Gaming Limited whose accounts clearly suggest they financially cannot support online gaming services. Probably what promted action from the UKGC.
 
It's quite normal when fraud is committed for this to be the case. Bogus companies generate false invoices to launder money to the sister company. Just hard to prove without little investment and a good accountant willing to work and spot this for you.
 
This could be an option we look into maybe to gather more supporting evidence. I have had no reply from companies house or action fraud so will chase this up in the coming days.
 
Finally to confirm what Dave Kumar mentioned in an earlier post. My view according to evidence I have gathered is fraud had been committed and all companies continued to promote and attian deposits from customers when they had no license to operate in UK. I fell victim to this and won £2300 from a bonus sold on Friday 5th of August. Evidence supplied to Comianies house.
 
Until I receive correspondence from Action Fraud I have no means of presenting the documentary evidence I have passed on to companies house, though given the extendend suspension then my evidence and other members evidence sent to them has got the message across.
 
So I urge us all to collectively keep plugging away. We will get a positive result I hope

Hi all,
 
As the administrators have said we should carry out dicussions here, I thought I would kick it off.
 
Thanks to Dogshead for leading on the request to Companies House. I have suggested to him that he overtly state that we believe Smart Live has been trading whilst insolvent. This seems quite probable given how long people have been owed money and the fact they kept making excuses or ignoring your communications. If this is found to be true, then even the directors can be held personally responsible to pay back debts and barred from being a director for 15 years. Otherwise, since it is a limited company, it is harder to hold anyone responsible but the company itself (even the shareholder's liability is limited). This is part of the fraud issue and since it has been overtly stated that they were trading without a licence, I believe it is worth stating this other part of the issue overtly too.